The Islamization of Sweden

A Somali woman who briefly worked as a journalist in Sweden said that the politically correct media makes Sweden more dangerous than Mogadishu. She discovered that Al-Shabaab were recruiting people from a recreational center and after running the story she received threats from locals while the Swedish journalists labeled her report as “hearsay”. So she moved back to Mogadishu.

Yes, you read correctly. She prefers Somalia to Sweden, because she considers it less dangerous than the Swedish suburb she lived in.

The fact that it’s easier to become a muslim radical in Sweden than in a muslim country should tell you all about how deranged Sweden is. Mona Walter came to Sweden from Somalia and it was first in Sweden that she encountered radical Islam on a daily basis. She converted to Christianity and became a critic of Islam, which caused her such severe threats that she now lives under secret identity.

To the rest of the world Sweden gives off the image of being a peaceful and progressive, nearly utopian, society but this is merely a facade. Sure, it might be true if we’re talking about the wealthy all-white all-Swedish neighborhoods in the fancy parts of Stockholm, but when it comes to the segregated suburbs it’s like that alcoholic dope fiend family member everybody wants to pretend doesn’t exist.

The Swedish suburbs are becoming more radicalized by each year. Immigrant women living there have recently come out and confessed that there’s sharia police walking around telling women how to dress, that they deserve to die if they don’t wear hijab, that Swedish food is “haram”, that they aren’t allowed to visit cafés, and so on.

aba

The city of Gothenburg alone has produced more ISIS-jihadists than all of America. According to a former islamist, now secular muslin, wahhabists are in control of several major mosques in Sweden. This is a rather small branch within Islam but since they’re being funded by Saudi-Arabia they have the biggest financial muscles to flex.

This sentiment is echoed by Aje Carlbom who is a docent in social anthropology and teacher in religion at Malmö university. Since the 1970’s Saudi Arabia has been working globally to spread their radical interpretation of Islam by funding the building of mosques all over the world, and then sending their radical preachers there. The Saudi mission is organised by the Muslim World League.

Of course, the mainstream media don’t talk about this. Possibly because Saudi-Arabia is bribing media all over the world to talk about them positively, so it wouldn’t surprise me if Sweden is on the list too.

Not to mention that Western countries to this day are allied with Saudi-Arabia for the sake of oil and business, and have previously funded the spreading of radical Islam. In fact, Ronald Reagan himself called Bin Ladin and his gang of mujahideens “an inspiration to freedom”. Great video about that here.

Sweden has no working legislation against terrorism.

It’s not illegal to join or recruit for the Islamic State. If the national security police suspect someone of being a terrorist, most they can do is give them a phone call. They aren’t legally allowed to do more.

There’s even examples of individuals who’ve fought for ISIS, returned to Sweden to receive healthcare for their injuries, and then returned to Syria to fight some more. ISIS is the most inhuman monster since the Nazis during the second World War, and Sweden is – yet again – not doing anything to stop it.

The migration board is discovering that all the more terrorists and war criminals are seeking asylum in Sweden, pretending to be refugees in order to escape punishment. Thus far in 2015 the migration board has submitted 363 cases to the swedish national security police. In all of 2014 they only submitted 109.

Here’s the kicker: If the 363 cases of suspected ISIS-terrorists would be confirmed as terrorists, Sweden still wouldn’t be allowed to deport them. Because Syria is a conflict zone, and apparently it’s against human rights to deport someone to a conflict zone.

Also, every attempt to sharpen terror laws is met by muslim organisations going apeshit about how it would stigmatise the muslims of Sweden. The major muslim organisations claim to represent muslims but in reality they represent the Muslim Brotherhood more than anything.

Islamists claiming to fight islamophobia are given millions in tax funding every year to spread intolerance. A muslim organisation were given money to run a website which was supposed to “build bridges” between muslims and non-muslims, but instead they had the website say that homosexuals should be punished with death and that it’s forbidden for muslims to be friend with non-muslims.

This is just one incident of many. If you want to see a detailed presentation of how tax-funded mosques and muslim organisations in Sweden are spreading sexism and intolerance, watch this video I’ve put together. It’s rather long so for that reason there’s a table of contents with timelines in the video description.

The public debate in Sweden also suffers from extreme leftist ideology. People who condone tougher laws on terror are more or less waved off as xenophobic by both the left-wing and the right-wing, who consider terrorism to be a symptom of social injustice, exclusion, racism and unemployment. So the general feeling in the Swedish debate is almost this: Unless we take care of racism and poverty first, we shouldn’t bitch about terrorism, because we sort of deserve it. It’s our fault.

And on top of all this, secular muslims are hounded by left-wingers for being ”racist” when speaking out against radicals. They go so far as to call them “house niggers”. Sadly, this part isn’t unique to Sweden, it seems to happen to sensible muslims everywhere.

This is Sweden in 2015. Islamisation is an institutionalized process made possible by the complete cowardice and ignorance of Swedish politicians and journalists. They don’t know anything about muslims, and they don’t want to know. All they want to do is further their own career by saying what they think muslims want to hear, and avoiding labels such as ”racist” and ”islamophobic” – the latter of which is the islamist’s favourite tool to blur the line between democracy and theocracy.

”Islamophobe” is a word purposely confusing well-founded criticism against religion with bigoted hatred towards all of it’s followers.

Any sound critic of religion knows well enough to differentiate between people and ideology. Criticizing Islam (a collection of ideas) and demonizing muslims (individuals with varying interpretations) are very different things. The word ”islamophobe” makes it impossible to have a constructive, nuanced conversation about Islam and islamism.

The people who are shouting that muslims are taking over the world and that you can’t trust a single muslim ”because it says somewhere that they’re allowed to lie to infidels”, those people are just as destructive to the development of society as the cowards who don’t wanna focus on radicals what so ever. Because they completely ruin the public debate and make it impossible for any well-founded criticism against islamism to come through.

We need to salute the values that make western countries attractive to live in, secular countries where you are entitled to mock and challenge religious authorities, because the right to ridicule religion is directly tied to human rights and freedom of speech. Equality and democracy are good things, they are not something we should apologize for. These values can be embraced by anyone, blacks as well as whites, muslims as well as christians.

And just because most muslims are peaceful doesn’t mean that radical muslims are a small issue. It’s said that roughly 10% percent of Germans during the second world war were Nazis. That’s a small minority, and look what they accomplished.

The civil rights movement in America was a small minority too, but they managed to give all blacks in America equal rights. Sometimes, minorities are the ones pushing through all the change happening in society and they should never be underestimated. For better or for worse.

The fact that radicals are a minority doesn’t make anything less serious. If you wanna stop hatred towards muslims, then work on shrinking that radical minority down to the point where they aren’t the biggest threat to western civilization today. Stop acting like that minority is harmless and just consisting of people with weird opinions. It’s way more dangerous than that.

So stop entertaining the racism of low expectations, and help the moderate muslim voices become stronger – instead of calling them porchmonkeys.

Advertisements

The Refugee Children of Sweden

Recently, the Swedish newspaper Gothenburg-Post wrote a sob story about a 16-year old unaccompanied refugee child who….. appears to be a full-grown man.

child

Does that person look 16 to you?

What’s even worse is that Avpixlat, a site often labeled as racist, completely destroyed their report simply by going on the guys facebook and looking through pictures and info. They discovered that he registered on a dating site in 2008. If his age was true then he was looking for a fuckbuddy at the age of 8. But as you can see for yourself, his age is 24 on the site.

CRyYxORUEAAN61_.jpg large ARSE

Do I need to explain to you what a disaster it is that established journalists in the massmedia don’t even look through basic information before writing a sobby character portrait? The guy claims to be a refugee from Afghanistan and painted up this story of miserable experiences at the hands of human smugglers, while his Facebook account is full of pictures with him posing in RayBay-shades wearing a big wrist watch in Istanbul.

1

Or why not this image of him suffering at the poolside in Southern Europe? No wonder he moved to Sweden, considering how terrible his circumstances were.

2

His gallery gives the impression of tourism rather than war. In the article with GP he showed the journalists a map of his travel route: Afghanistan – Pakistan – Iran – Turkey – Greece – Makedonia – Serbia – Hungary – Austria – Germany – Denmark – Sweden. Several of these are safe countries yet they don’t ask him any questions about why he’s avoided seeking asylum in them.

When he came to Sweden it was winter and “all he owned was a mobile phone and the clothes he was wearing.” There’s no explanation to how he was able to lose his passport but not his iPhone. Like the majority of people granted asylum in Sweden he hasn’t been able to verify his identity.

Case workers at the Migration board have said that asylum seekers from Syria and Eritrea ger their application granted in nearly 100% of the cases, yet 72% of applicants from Eritrea lack passports and for Syria the number is 98%. They simply don’t know if the person is who they say they are, and they don’t really care either because the order from higher ups is basically to accept as many as possible in as short of a time span as possible.

When case workers at the Migration board turn on their workcomputer a message pops up to remind them of the boards vision: “We view migration as a positive force, something that contributes to making our country richer both financially and culturally.”

A former case worker at the Migration board wrote a debate article saying it’s far too easy for ISIS-terrorists to get into Sweden, because even if the workers get suspicious there’s no time to investigate. Cases are supposed to be handled in max 1.5 hours compared to the 2.5 hours a “normal” asylum application takes.

As a case worker you’re expected to hand in at least 3 finished decisions per week, the number of finished errands decide your individual pay grade and possibility for permanent employment. In other words, the work theme is “the more the merrier” and you are given the choice to either keep your job – or do a good job.

Does this man look like 16 to you?

16

Does this guy look like 17 to you? Should he be in a school with other 17-year olds?

muhammad

The number of children seeking asylum in Sweden has exploded over the last ten years, presumably because children are granted asylum much quicker than adults and Swedish authorities don’t verify the age of these so called children. The Migration board is expecting 30’000 unaccompanied refugee children to arrive in Sweden 2015. In Denmark, they put 282 unaccompanied refugee children through age tests and found out that 203 of them were adults lying about their age.

In Norway, teeth x-rays revealed that 9 out of 10 unaccompanied refugee children are above the age of 18. Sometimes they are as much as 10 years older. Asha from Somalia said she was 19 when she was actually 30 and for her that’s entailed life-threatening issues. She has high blood pressure but is wrongly medicated due to her incorrect age. She is quoted in the article saying: “The doctor changes medication all the time but it doesn’t help, but I can’t say anything about my age.”

So put simply: This is fucked up for everyone involved. Immigrants lying about their age can be given the wrong medication which contributes to their death, if they say they’re younger than their actual age they’ll also have to work longer and retire later than what’s normal. It’s also bad for Swedish taxpayers who are financing these con artists, but the ones who get it absolute worst of all are actual refugee children who are starving to death in refugee camps that lack funds.

Some weeks ago the government came out and said that they were going to take 8.2 billion SEK from our humanitarian aid budget and put it on refugees who come to Sweden instead. And they declared this the day after UN came out and said they had to cancel food and water for 360’000 refugees near the conflict area due to lack of funds. Now, our prime minister is saying even more money is gonna have to be taken from the aid budget.

Tino Sanandaji is a kurdish national economist in Sweden and his response to this is as following: “The UN:s resources for 2.5 million Afghan refugees equals the cost of 300 unaccompanied refugee children for one year. Cutting down on healthcare and schooling for millions of poor in order to afford a few expensive refugees in Sweden isn’t “taking responsibility”, it’s blatant madness. It will only seem as reasonable to our government because they’re captured in mass psychosis. What Sweden is about to do is a misdeed of historical proportions, and those who have pushed this forward have many lives on their hands.”

He links to an article by Reuters which explains that because of the “migrant crisis” dominating headlines and demanding cash, the UNHCR in Pakistan has received only $33.6 million for 2015 out of its $136.7 million annual budget.

So if you support asylum immigration to Sweden, you’re also supporting the oppression of the poor and excluded in other countries. Basically, the world has officially gone full retard. In Sweden you’re considered racist if you don’t want to accept refugees because that means you don’t care about poor foreigners in need. But according to that line of logic you’re also racist if you want refugees in Sweden, because that means you don’t care about poor foreigners in need.

Clearly, everyone is racist.

Asylum seekers? More like luxury seekers.

Here’s yet another protest by refugees who claim that they’re being treated badly in Sweden: http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=86&artikel=6271692

In this case the food isn’t good enough, therefore they decided to put together signs and go stand in the town square to demand “respect”. Apparently it’s very disrespectful that the staff at the asylum house put together a menu with arab food for them, but aren’t cooking it the same way that they’re used to in their home country. One of the spokespersons for the protest said: “If you’re gonna make food then please – make it good.”

Apparently the food is such a big deal it warrants them holding up signs with the dead 3-year old kurdish boy Alan and text saying: “Don’t kill us again.”

12081517_10203989945229119_843941245_n

12092424_10203989945429124_558510309_n

The article says that there were also other complaints, but doesn’t specify what this is other than one of the other refugees saying that the food isn’t the main issue and that they “need to be treated as humans”.

In another article however, in a newspaper, the refugees claimed that the staff yells at them about all things possible. The owner, however, says that it’s simply not true but that they have to tell the refugees firmly if they catch them smoking in their rooms, something the staff has been clear isn’t allowed. She is also saddened by the criticsm because she feels it boils down to misunderstandings, and that they also do a lot for the refugees that they don’t have to do. For example, they give them Wi-Fi access in their rooms and TV’s with arabic channels.

One refugee also claimed that a staff member roughly grabbed her son in order to take away a toy which the little boy was intending on bringing to the restaurant, and that her son started screaming from the fear and pain. The owner, however, isn’t familiar with this incident. (Let’s be honest, kids will go apeshit whenever you try to take something from them.)

12071538_10203990622606053_1892432201_n

12084084_10203990623406073_1239109155_n

Honestly, I don’t know whether or not this protest is warranted. It’s entirely possible that privately owned asylum houses are corrupted and compromise the living standard of their housing in order to cheat themselves to more money, but it’s also possible that these refugees are just spoiled. They seem to be expecting better food than we give our elderly citizens, and it’s not the first time we’ve seen examples of luxury seekers around these here parts in Scandinavia.

In Finland, three Iraqi refugees posted a videoclip on Facebook saying: “We’re already considering returning to Iraq. We regret coming to Finland. We were wrong! We paid huge sums all for nothing. In Iraq you think everything is so extraordinary in Europe, that Europe is something divine. But it’s just completely ordinary here.”

Completely ordinary = life without bombs. What the hell, did he think they were going to Disneyland or something? If they had arrived there he probably would’ve complained about the rollercoasters too.

“The situation in Europe is tough. Sure, you’re safe here, but the toilets are dirty, there isn’t any clothes, food is expensive… The portions at receptioncentrals are small, they’re not even enough for children. Running from your country is terribly humiliating. You can’t get a job here. It was wrong to come here.”

They even go so far as to say: “Stay in your home country if you’re there, even if it means death or being hurt. At least you’re home in your country.”

At the same time you can read that around 40 refugees have decided to return to Iraq instead of waiting for asylum in Sweden, since the process can be very long. One really has to wonder: How great is the threat of death in your home country if you’re willing to return just because you might end up waiting in Sweden?

Numbers from Eurostat show that only 1 in 5 refugees are actually from Syria. Half a million migrants have arrived in Europe so far this year, with 156,000 coming in August alone. Rather than claiming asylum in the first safe EU country they reach, most head on toward wealthy northern countries.

Refugees who were interviewed by Danish television were asked why they didn’t stay in a peaceful country. The reply was that Denmark has too low welfare checks, so therefore they want to Sweden instead. When interviewed, a syrian refugee confirmed this image saying that the majority of people claiming to be refugees are simply trying to upgrade their living standard and exploit european welfare-societies. So did this one testify.

What conclusions are there to be drawn here? Is Sweden a shit country that can’t accept refugees properly, or are certain refugees just spoilt brats? One thing is for sure: During the Balkan crisis in the 90s, us Bosnian refugees didn’t complain about not being able to create music in the asylum house. An incident in December 2014 had 40-something refugees refuse to get off the bus in protest because the asylum house they were gonna live in “is too cold” and they didn’t like having to live 8 people in one room. They even went so far as to imply that the refugee camp in Lebanon they lived in for 2 years prior was better because “even though we had to sleep on the street we weren’t cold there”. They even planned a hunger strike because of their discontent.

Another paper reported how refugees were disappointed because they had to wait a whole week for a dental appointment. Here’s the kicker though: Asylum seekers in Sweden get free dental while waiting to have their asylum application treated. Swedish citizens do not get free dental. In fact, a 55-year old woman was forced to sell nearly all her possessions in order to afford dental work for a tumor in her jaw, and over the past 10 years she’s spent 250’000 SEK on dental work because of her condition.

And there are some places in Sweden where you have to wait 5 years for an appointment because the dental service is legally obliged to accept refugee children first and foremost. Swedish adults seeking service are told to visit private clinics instead. Keeping all this mind, perhaps the refugees shouldn’t bitch about having to wait a week considering that our public health sector is strained as it is.

Another bus protest occured because the refugees felt the rooms are too small and too far into the woods.

And recently 30 out of 100 refugees were so unhappy with being placed at a military camp in Åstön that they started marching by foot to Sundsvall to reach the train station there. Apparently it was unacceptable that it’s so cold, no stores and no communications nearby. (The weather at the time of the article varied between +4°C and +14°C. If you have a problem with cold, why do you come to a country where the winter temperature can be way below zero?)
They wanted to live in a city and didn’t appreciate ending up “in the middle of nowhere.” Now, tell me something. Does this look like unacceptable living standards for someone who’s fled the threat of death in the Middle East?

åston

åston militärförläggning

It is clear that many asylum seekers who come to Sweden expect a very high standard of living, even at an asylum house. But can you blame them? Our politicians are just as deceptive as the human smugglers are. Sure, our politicians might not say that you will get a free house and a Swedish girlfriend if you come to Sweden – like the smugglers say – but they sure give off the illusion that everything is going to be fine. As if there’s housing and jobs for everyone.

Newsflash: There isn’t. The local migration authorities all basically say the same thing when these refugee protests take place: The system is strained. We’re taking in a lot of people, perhaps more than we can handle, so this is what we have to offer at the moment.

I mean freaking hell, in Jönköping we even had to move 40 refugees to another asylum house in order to fit more newly arrived refugees. So we’re basically moving refugees to fit refugees. And guess what? That turned into a protest too.

In another case two female volunteers who were handing out free clothes at an asylum house were beaten and threatened by an asylum seeker in his 40’s, because apparently “the residents have felt frustrated by not being able to pick clothes on their own. They’re upset that we’re telling them to write up what they need on a list, and that we’re organising and handing out the clothes according to that.” The boss also says that they’re “used to handling situations like this.”

Here’s another case. Seriously, look at the video in the article linked. They’re playing football in a grass field, they say that there is internet and ping-pong tables there, and that they came to Sweden because they heard that it’s the best country in the world: “The people are so nice and understand the meaning of human rights.”
And yet, they are disappointed. Why? Because they have “nothing to do all day”, and “we have been living here for 14 days and nobody from the Migration board has come to greet us and ask us how we’re doing, and if we need anything. That would have made it feel more motivated to come here. Knowing that someone takes an interest in us would have been enough.”

Basically they sound like a bad female stereotype that gets angry at you for not spending every waking moment catering to her mood swings and reading her mind when she’s pouty. You should KNOW what you did wrong, you bastard!

Furthermore, they go on to say that they live in a room that looks like a prison and complain about not being able to open the window. They literally say that it’s their “biggest problem” there, because when they close the door it gets “stuffy”. Their conclusion is that they regret coming to Sweden becuse they have “nothing” here. Seriously. Watch the video I linked, see for yourself what their room looks like, and then ask yourself: Is that a reasonable reaction for someone who has fled the threat of death?

This makes me think of the incident that I started this blogpost with. In that case, the asylum seekers got together and protested because they demand “respect”. Respect is a good word considering some of the incidents we have seen in Sweden over the past year or so. One simply has to wonder how these so called “refugees” are showing respect by coming to a country and shitting on everyone that’s helping them. Surely, demanding things from strangers as if you were a kid is the complete opposite of respect?

I would like you, dear reader, to perform a thought experiment: Try to imagine what country you would look down upon enough in order to be able to behave like those “refugees” are doing.

Personally, I don’t believe that they are all innocent victims like the media wants to portray. I am absolutely sure that some of them are real refugees. I remember that when I heard of one of the first bus protests there was a refugee woman who came with the same bus, she was interviewed by reporters and she said that she was very grateful for Sweden taking her in, and that those who were protesting should be ashamed of themselves, and that they didn’t represent everyone on that bus. I am sure of that, and that many are real refugees. However, I also suspect that many are simply luxury seekers.

Real refugees would be greatful to escape the threat of death. I came to Sweden as a war refugee when I was a child, and most of these people I’ve listed in this post make me fucking sick. They have no place in Sweden. They are not refugees. They are people who want to live their entire life on Swedish welfare.