The nazi punch that echoed around the world

Alt-right leader Richard Spencer got punched on live TV: 

I’m so tired of seeing people celebrate this retarded stunt.

First of all, I can’t believe the amount of people cheering over a sucker punch. Quite possibly the most cowardly way you can attack someone, and people let their morals out the window as soon as it happens to someone they dislike.

They are literally cheering on a coward. Spencer was fully immersed in his TV interview when it happened, his guard was down, and the perp ran away like a 5-year old kid.

It wasn’t even that great of a punch. Even with the element of surprise he wasn’t able to knock someone outAnd now we see the progressive feminist left mocking Richard Spencer for being weak and unmanly:

c22eukouoaayx4i

So they’re maintaining the exact same heteronormative macho bullshit they usually claim to be against. Isn’t that interesting? Apparently heteronormativity is only a problem when you can’t use it against someone.

Also note that they never adress how the person who punched Spencer literally is a shit-eating submissive sex-slave: https://alt-right-news.blogspot.se/2017/01/spencer-attacker-revealed-to-be-shit.html (Warning for graphic images)

If you’re gonna talk about manlyness then fucking do it correctly.

Last, but certainly not least, thanks to the punch Richard Spencers popularity soared.

spencer

And if you search “Richard Spencer” on Twitter, all over social media you can see leftists laughing at how funny it is to see “the wicked evil man guy” get physically assaulted. But as usual the feminist left is prioritizing feelings over logic, and this is exactly why you are losing.

A punch is not a counter-argument. A punch will not change someones worldview. And it will certainly not deflate the frustration people feel over what the politicians are doing to your country. All you’ve managed to accomplish is to give a man notoriety, without challenging his ideas. As such, you’ve only furthered the scope of said ideas.

You might think poorly of Richard Spencers vision for a utopian society, but the alternative you’re providing isn’t much better. Reasonable people don’t want to live in a world where you get punched for having unpopular opinions.

Also, it is interesting to see how ANTIFA has spread to America. I see pundits all over the place talking about what a new phenomenon this is, to see violent leftists who actually attack right-wingers. We’ve had them here in Sweden for a long time, and they’re an interesting bunch. They believe that smashing someone’s apartment makes society a better place:

ANTIFA was born as a counter-reaction to nazism. We had a real problem with that in the 90’s here in Sweden, with skinhead gangs running around the streets beating up immigrants for no reason other than blatant racism. So ANTIFA was born as a defense for immigrants and left-wingers who were physically attacked solely for having “the wrong thoughts” or “the wrong skin”. And at one point in time it was actually about fighting back against racism. Now, however, it’s just become it’s own ideology with it’s own fascist tendencies.

You know what the worst part is? I think Richard Spencer is a moron. Seriously, the dude said that only white people deserve to explore space, and that being an immigrant is “pathetic”. He’s literally saying that people running for their lives are pathetic. He’s the epitome of a spoiled, privileged white male. Something that SJWs usually talk about as a fantasy, he actually embodies.

But even with all that in mind, the left is FORCING me to respect him. Because it’s so terribly easy to stand up for your opinion when you got the entire media establishment holding your back. In fact, it’s so easy, that I’m disgusted by how spoiled people are when they don’t understand basic principles like freedom of speech.

If you can’t even provide a counter-argument to Spencers claims, then you’re dumber than he is. Should it really be that hard?

Violence is not the best way to fight racist views, and I suspect that the violent antics from the left is only going to empower the right. Because then they can easily point and show who the most civilized ones are.

No, Angry Foreigner is Not Alt-Right

I do not consider myself alt-right, and I never have. I don’t even consider myself ordinary right-wing. Every political test I’ve done places me left of center, and although Im not interested in labeling myself politically it should at least give testament to people’s misconceptions of me.

Ever since Hillary Clinton’s speech, all of a sudden everyone is defining themselves as alt-right. The term has even spread to Sweden where we, as far as I know, don’t have any alt-right movement online.

We do, however, have a very small anarchocapitalist movement who are  trying to capitalize on the alt-rights growing popularity. They seem to have deluded themselves into thinking they qualify as alt-right, simply because they’re discontent capitalists. I guess that crazy bullshit cult is just hungry for some marketing.

Look, the fact that there’s a couple of confused capitalists in this pile of race realists is irrelevant when the movement as a whole is talking mostly about jews. I’ve seen people write shit like: “The alt-right is just a term for anyone who’s against political correctness and the regressive left!”

No, “alt-right” is not a general term for common sense. The unifying core beliefs of the alt-right is that equality is a dangerous myth, and the dogma that all races are equal needs to be rejected. They are ”race realists” who think that the most important thing you can talk about is the jewish question. They also believe that culture is directly tied to race and biology, which then leads them to draw the conclusion that muslims can never truly change.

And for some reason people think I’m a philosophical ally of the alt-right. Because I reject tolerance for the sake of tolerance, I reject virtue signaling, I hate suicidal ”progressive” policies and the destructive Black Lives Matter movement.

Here’s the thing tho: Anyone with half a brain is against these things. Including many left-wingers. Being against political correctness doesn’t make you special. We can’t give white nationalists patent on common sense.

And when did I ever say that all races aren’t equal? I’ve not once made a video on racial biology. If you consider me a philosophical ally of those guys it’s because you’ve made assumptions about opinions I don’t have.

Here’s the thing about cultures: Western culture is awesome because it allows porn, women can fuck around, countries are largely secular and don’t respect religion, fags and trannies have human rights, or at least many of us are trying to give them equal rights.

There’s a conversation happening about allowing people to step outside of gender norms, and even though feminism goes way too far sometimes, there are sensible feminists as well. There’s also a general respect for freedom of speech in the Western world, even though many SJWs are trying to change that.

Many muslim countries don’t have any of these things. That’s why I criticize them. Because they aren’t progressive.

Now, with the exception of freedom of speech, the alt-right hate these things I mentioned. They hate progressive values. They think slutshaming is biologically defensible, and that traditional gender roles should be enforced on everyone.

They freak out when I wear nail polish, and when I made a video celebrating pornstars and disputing slutshaming they called me a cuck and got REALLY triggered, because I had the nerve to “promote a jewish invention whose purpose is to destabilize Western society”. By that they mean porn.

The alt-right are just as regressive as the radical muslims they despise. They’re essentially right-wing SJWs. Instead of “racist” they just call everyone “cuck”. And while I do agree that insult is funny as hell, and certainly has some merits, they take the definition way too far sometimes. They’ll call someone a cuck just because he isn’t strongly against race-mixing. Black girls are fucking hot, why would any heterosexual male oppose race-mixing? Come on.

And so it becomes kinda weird to see them in my following, since everything I criticize about radical muslims and ethno-masochistic leftists directly applies to them as well. Clearly we have very different views of what Western culture actually is, and what parts of it are worth preserving.

The alt-right is simply a reaction to the SJWs that have been dominating public discourse for so long. Ironically, however, the alt-right are just as collectivist, narrow-minded and bigoted as the SJWs they despise. I’ve seen them get triggered when I make jokes about Hitler, or unfavorable comparisons to Hitler.

Some people are trying to say that the alt-right is a diverse group consisting of many different factions. I call bullshit on that. While it is true that there’s a number of unhappy conservatives present, they are outnumbered by the racists.

The alt-right aren’t joking when they deny the holocaust, praise Hitler and talk about ethnic cleansing with a dash of romance. I know some of the guys are trolling, but there’s way too many who believe that shit for real. And the most progressive people you’re gonna find in that movement are…… Well. Not even Milo Yiannopolous and Gavin McInnes identify as alt-right. I think that says a lot.

Trolling as a political tool

I was reading this article about the alt-right, and I came across a piece about how trolling can be used as a political tool, that I found quite fascinating:

”On the personal side, these folks find trolling progressives online almost orgasmically cathartic; in the longer game, they believe that repeatedly poking communities of so-called “Social Justice Warriors” online makes these sub-communities look so ridiculous in the public gaze that any broad-based support for them will eventually collapse.”

People underestimate the power of trolling. And by that, I mean the actual definition of the term. Here in Sweden the word has become so raped by retarded SJWs who use it to describe literally anyone who doesn’t have 100% politically correct opinions. When established journalists and media are repeatedly using the word this way, the public loses sight of what trolling actually is.

A real troll is someone who argues for opinions they don’t actually have, simply to provoke others. And if you do this the right way you can make others lower themselves to a level which makes them come across as idiots. Partly because they’re buying into it to begin with, and partly because they get so emotionally triggered that they can’t even come up with reasonable counter-arguments.

And when it comes to resistance against political correctness, the biggest problem of all is that people are cowards. Just take the following example, I’ve had this personally told to me as an issue, with people writing me saying that you don’t dare pissing off the rabid feminist in your class, because “what if she gets mad?”

Well duh. That’s exactly what you should be aiming for! Present your opinions in a calm and reasonable manner, and if you’re lucky she’ll get so pissed off that she’ll start roaring. At that point nobody will be able to take her seriously anymore. When someone freaks out because you’re arguing opinions that you can back up with logic, you’ll come across as an enlightened buddha in comparison.

And it doesn’t matter if the thing she’s screaming is “EQUALITYYYYYY!” An ape is an ape. People who are standing around observing the two of you aren’t gonna say it out loud, but they’re gonna feel more compelled to agree with you.

Migrants raped woman in wheelchair – Swedes have had enough

the-filipino-times_two-sharjah-residents-force-wives-into-prostitution

On the 6th of October the police sent extra units to Gotland in order to calm down furious Swedes, after a woman in a wheelchair was gangraped by 5 asylum seekers. The woman reportedly “broke down” after the horrible ordeal.

On the 5th of October cirka 100 people demonstrated in support of the woman. According to one of the demonstrators all of Gotland is currently in shock and many people are crying.

In another seperate incident earler that day, an activist from the national-socialist Nordic Resistance Movement went to the address where the woman was reportedly gangraped, and confronted 3 immigrant males who have been pointed out as suspects. In this videoclip they admit that they’ve been at the police station, but that they were released. Eventually the man lost his temper and shouted: “You are fucking scum! Leave this fucking country you filthy animals!”

Since that day the situation has supposedly escalated, and now special units are being sent there to deal with the locals. So the establishment are spending more resources keeping angry swedes in check, than they do locking away rape suspects from the rest of society.

The 5 men were detained at first but were released on Wednesday. According to the prosecutor the allegations don’t stick since the woman didn’t fight back enough. But of course she didn’t, because she’s in a wheelchair, she CAN’T fight back.

Her lawyer had this to say to Nyheter Idag: “Unfortunately victims of crime will find themselves in a worse position if they didn’t shout, scream, fight, scratch or bite. And partly because of her handicap she isn’t physically strong enough and mobile enough to have been able to escape.”

The men however claim that she wanted to have sex with complete strangers in a bathroom for several hours on end. And apparently the prosecutor chooses to believe this.

So it should come as no surprise that several locals in Gotland got pissed and issued threats towards the prosecutor, investigator, policemen and the suspects. The prosecutor got a “nightly visit” from someone, and the suspects aren’t even in Gotland anymore because of the threat against them. Which technically means they’re free to go somewhere else in Sweden and rape again.

And yet the establishment gets surprised at the anger. The media of Gotland is full of debate articles warning about racism, talking about how people need to calm down, and that Swedish men rape too. A collection can be found below.

This guy worries about racism.

The politicans say that “we need reasonable citizens now”.

This guy is talking about the influence of porn.

The police chief talks about “hate and ignorance”.

This guys draws comparisons to Nazi Germany and says that’s where we’re heading.

Swedish public service media along with “antiracist” organization Expo labels the demonstrators as nazis, or at least “ignorant people who are useful idiots to nazis”.

When the demonstration actually consisted of just plain ordinary people. The elderly, men, women, children, even immigrants. You could see strollers in the crowd of people, for christ sake.

Personally I think it’s about time Swedes get pissed off and speak up against their politicians. A demonstration is good. Everything is better than just sitting at home and being frustrated over the internet.

All our politicans have done thus far is to spit ordinary human beings in the face. They steal the peoples tax money, the result of a life’s hard work, and use it to implement policies that benefit everyone other than the people themselves. Then they call the taxpayers racists because they feel worried that hospitals don’t have enough room for people who need surgery, our senior citizens are living just a tad above street beggars in quality, and bathhouses and music festivals have suddenly become unsafe places for women.

Why should Swedish citizens behave better than Swedish politicans? That the politicans aren’t considered criminals is just a matter of how you want to define things. Their actions are certainly immoral at least, to the highest degree.

It’s not right to take the law into your own hands. That’s why politicans should listen to ordinary people instead of treating them like this. They’ve treated us like shit for far too long now.

On the upside, there is one piece of good news. Kinda.

This is from before the gangrape. The government is currently investigating sharpening up the rape legislation and adding more emphasis on consent, as well as a wording about severe negligence. According to the attorney of the woman in a wheelchair, a change to the legislation such as this would have helped her case if it was already in effect. He would’ve been able to have them detained in police custody and prosecuted.

He says that rape victims who don’t fight back very boldly are disadvantaged in court. The woman clearly said no to each new male who took turns with her, but yet that wasn’t enough. Even though she got injuries that have been documented.

According to him it should be enough: “Research shows that it’s not entirely uncommon that girls become paralyzed and shocked in situations like this, because they’re afraid of being hurt. My client wound up in that category, she became paralyzed. Eventually she gave up on the situation and aimed at just getting out of there alive.”

I agree with him. Swedish law, as it is right now, puts absurd demands on women. You basically have to beat up the perpetrator in order to be able to claim rape, physical resistance is necessary. This despite the fact that the most common reaction is freezing up.

Men are bigger and stronger than women, generally. Their bodies are weapons in their own right, and women are conscious of this. Expecting a frightened woman in a vulnerable position to smack a guy across the jaw, when he hasn’t shown any respect for her boundaries yet, is blatant idiocy. Why would she wanna give him an excuse to hurt her even more?

It’s not at all strange if someone becomes paralyzed in a situation like that. Ultimately it is men who have a special responsibility to be perceptive, not to just go “oh yay free pussy as long as she doesn’t shout loud”.

The new legislation that’s being investigated takes consideration to what reality actually looks like, and the part about “severe negligence” is especially important. It means someone could be convicted of rape without having intent, or premeditation. And the way it’s been the past years is that perpetrators have been able to get off just by claiming that “I thought she wanted it”, even when the girl has said no and the evidence spoke to her favor. But the intent couldn’t be proven.

Of course the rapist doesn’t have intent. Anybody who’s well-read on rapists knows that they rarely view what they do as rape: https://youtu.be/uvUSKkahl3M

They have zero self-distance. Usually they hate rapists as much as everybody else, and they don’t see themselves as rapists. If they happen to get convicted the best answer they can come up with when asked what happened, is “it just happened”. And if they complete therapy then suicide attempts are common, when they gain insight and truly realize what it is they’ve done.

Today the court focuses too much on whether the perpetrator understood or not. With a wording of negligence in the picture you’d be able to focus on the situation at hand, instead of the perpetrators personal view on sex.

What does “blatte” mean? Exploring Sweden’s ghetto culture

My artist name in English is “Angry Foreigner”. In Swedish it’s “En Arg Blatte Talar” which means An Angry Blatte Speaking. Blatte and foreigner don’t carry the same meaning, and when my channel became international I decided to go with something simple because a lot of people in Sweden didn’t understand the sarcasm/satire of my Swedish artist name. Allow me to explain.

“Blatte” for immigrant is what “nigga” is for black people. Chris Rock explained this perfectly.

Back in the 90’s “blatte” was widely acknowledged as an invective. It’s an insulting term meant to describe immigrants who live up to a bad stereotype; rowdy, noisy and refuse to learn the Swedish language because they think it’s cool to be a “gangsta”. Put simply it’s someone who takes pride in not being integrated.

They call female strangers “Swede-whores” and rob Swedish men because it makes them feel cool, not because they need the money to survive. There’s been a few interviews describing how the reason for their mugging is that they want money for partying and fancy brand clothing. Not for food or housing. In other words, it should be impossible for leftists to defend these materialistic reactionary  shitheads, but they still manage in some way.

Blattar will look at Swedish men and find them pathetic because they are civilized human beings who don’t immediately resort to violence to solve verbal conflicts. Blattar will look at Swedish girls and think that they are cheap whores, because they subscribe to Western morality. In other words: Swedish girls dare to have sex before marriage, wear clothing that shows skin and enjoy sex, so because of  this they have less value and are more or less okay to rape. And no, Im not exaggerating. Read the hyperlinks.

Put simply, “blatte” started out as a slur for immigrants who behave badly. But in recent years it has become diluted, normalized and synonymous with the word “immigrant”. So when I made my very first video in Swedish a lot of people misunderstood what I was saying. They thought I was spewing hatred towards immigrants in general, when in fact I was only speaking ill of the immigrants who insist on being stereotypical self-destructive feces.

And let me be really fucking clear on this: As an immigrant I take offense to this minority of disgusting morons making the majority of us look bad.

Do not for a second underestimate the destruction a single pack of these animals can cause. The identity of the blatte is founded upon personal insecurities combined with an exaggerated feeling of cockyness. Blattar seek out physical altercations to assert their dominance, and you can never tell a blatte he’s done something wrong without him exploding and talking about “yo mamas pussy”.

This creature completely lacks self-distance and feels the entire world owes them something. They will constantly demand respect, simply for their mere existence, while not showing anyone even the most basic respect. This is an example of ordinary daily behavior for a blatte,

Blatte: Eyyy you swedish whore, suck me dick, how much u cost?

Girl: You’re a disgusting idiot.

Blatte: YOU FUCKING RACIST

To call passing female strangers whores, and seek out fights over trivialities like someone looking at you for more than 4 seconds, is an everyday routine for this animal. Blattar is one of the reasons why racism is created, because repeated meetings with these singular individuals easily create hatred and prejudice.

It doesn’t matter that 90% of immigrants are decent human beings who don’t commit any crimes. You’re not going to notice them, because they don’t affect your life. They’re normal people. A pack of blattar however will affect you severely, because it’s in the nature of humans to focus on negative experiences more than positive ones. Thus, just having a few encounters with these animals will contribute to someone becoming racist. Whether they want to or not their brain is going to create negative associations to non-Swedes.

blattarrrrr

Why do these type of people exist?

To summarize, Sweden’s immigration policy is about taking in way more immigrants than you can handle, and sticking them all into segregated housing areas, IE ghettos. Sweden being a humanitarian nation is the biggest scam about this country because our politicians couldn’t give a shit less about immigrants. They actively choose to live as far from immigrants as possible.

The result of Sweden’s irresponsible immigration policy is segregation. In the beginning of the 90’s there were 3 ghettos in all of Sweden. Today there’s approximately 186. When you take a shitload of immigrants and let them live together without the presence of any Swedes two things will happen.

1. There is no integration. You’re growing up in an area where you don’t even need to learn Swedish, because you are not surrounded by Swedes. You are surrounded by your countrymen. And thus you will not adapt, because there is no social incentive to do such.

2. A feeling of isolation is born. And in this social vacuum resentment and suspicion will start growing. This article by two politicians from the People Party says it all. They went to schools in some of these areas where ethnic Swedes make out a minority, and talked to the students there. Allow me to translate a few paragraphs.

-“What’s the worst thing you could be called?”
– “A SWEDE!”
The group of immigrants all screamed at once. The few ethnic Swedish youths in the corner of the room didn’t even take notice. This is their everyday life in the Swedish ghettos: Swede-whore, Swede-fag, peasant, Swede-racist, and fucking Swede. Words they hear on a daily basis. Almost every time it’s the same situation when we visit these ghetto schools in Sweden. Students openly display their contempt for what they consider Swedish.

Many youths in these areas don’t feel any connection to Swedishness, but equate it to being cold-hearted and wussy, something you wanna distance yourself from. There’s also an attitude about how female Swedishness is the same as being a tramp with no morals. If an immigrant girl stands up for her rights and lives as freely as guys she is viewed as “Swedeified” by many, which is considered horrendous.”

Both the political Left and Right in Sweden seems to think that the solution to these problems is building more apartments and giving immigrants jobs that don’t exist yet. But if you build more housing it’s going to be primarily immigrants who move there and then we have yet another exclusion area. None of the political parties (except for the Sweden Democrats) want to admit that integration can only work if immigrants are mixed with Swedes, and in order for that to happen you can’t maintain high immigration for years on end.

Take a look at this chart below. It shows the number of car fires and how they’ve increased over the years. Nuff said.

bilbränder

And if you ask me, this situation is also the result of the disgusting rhetoric by the political Left. They constantly talk about “structural racism” in Sweden and act as if this country is so horribly racist that you don’t even stand a chance.

I’ve come across numerous immigrants who honestly said that they don’t see the point in working hard and studying, because “it doesn’t pay off if you’re an immigrant”. The regressive left is destroying the spirits of immigrants in Sweden, making them feel more excluded and turning them against Swedish people.

Can a Swede be a blatte?

A blatte is an immigrant who thinks he’s a gangbanger from Compton. This foreigner comes from, for example, Iraq – lives in Sweden – yet gets his identity from ghetto culture in America. And then he has the nerve to insult assimilated immigrants for having an identity crisis and being “swedified”.

The blatte wrongfully belives he can related to negroes living in Compton, listens way too much to gangsta rap, and watches Scarface way too many times, to the point where he starts idolizing criminality and materialism. Blattar think that the coolest thing you can do is to treat other people like shit, because being kind and responsible is considered to be weakness.

Being a blatte is more about behavior than ethnicity. Blatte simply refers to a person that’s non-Swedish or non-white and acts like a gangsta stereotype. Thus the person can be Arab of African, but also Bosnian or Italian. It is possible for white Swedes to be blattar as well but in that case it’s more appropriate to call them “wannabe-blattar” since we’re talking about a ethnic Swede pretending to be an immigrant pretending to be a gangsta nigga from America.

So why did you choose to call yourself “blatte” as an artist-name?

Because it’s ironic. It’s satire. It’s meant to ridicule immigrants who take pride in stupidity and degenerate behavior.

When you grow up as an immigrant in Sweden you’re aware of other peoples expectations of you. There is a clear perception of what immigrants are “supposed” to be, and if you defy those expectations other immigrants will call you a “swedefied faggot” and a race traitor. You know how many times I’ve been told Im not a “real Bosnian” simply because I listen to satanic metal?

The purpose of my artist name is to mock and destroy peoples perceptions of what an immigrant is “supposed” to be.

“Immigrant” is not a fucking identity, it’s simply something that you do; relocate to a different country. Yet it’s typical for immigrants to associate values and behavior to that label. There’s an idea in society of what an immigrant is supposed to look like, act, and think, and immigrants themselves are the ones upholding this stereotype as if it’s a legitimate identity.

I’ve seen immigrants pretend to have an accent they don’t even have. I’ve seen them pretend to be shittier at speaking Swedish than they really are, just so they appear to be more “immigrant”. I’ve seen people create their sense of self in the conflict of Swedish VS Non-Swedish. It is absolutely pathetic. Be yourself and fuck whatever cultural prison someone else is trying to lock you into.

My artist name is a mockery of the destructive blatte-culture whose morality includes hating police, common sense and decent behavior. I’ve heard of immigrants who’ve been mocked by other immigrants because they try getting good grades in school and learn to speak Swedish properly. Are you seriously gonna tell me that’s not a huge problem?

As an immigrant I feel provoked by what this blatte-culture entails because I do not buy the notion that all immigrants need to be stupid violent macho-caricatures. Do not try to lock me into a box where I am not allowed to explore my own thoughts and feelings. You might expect feminists and leftists to wanna take this fight alongside me, but instead they’re telling me Im the problem.

Immigrants are not a homogenous group. Immigrants can come from all corners of the world. A white American is as much of an immigrant as a black Somalian. Just because you’re born in a different country doesn’t mean you have to be a complete dumbass.

But considering how many people didn’t understand the blatant irony in “En Arg BLATTE talar” I decided to go with something simple when I turned to an English audience. So that’s why I chose to call myself the Angry Foreigner, because it can’t be misinterpreted as wildly.

Perhaps I thought too well of humans when I assumed they’d be able to read between the lines.

Horrible tale from inside a Swedish ghetto

ghetto

This is a comment that a Swede left on my video about the horror of being gay in Sweden’s muslims ghettos. I thought it was worth posting because it’s well-written and nuanced, with insight that I rarely see in the debate about immigration and regressive cultural values.

Here it goes.

“Most of the people commenting this video are living outside of these ghettos. People haven’t lived where radical Islam is the norm. Where riots have occurred. Where you can’t see a lot of the people’s faces. Another thing I find funny is that always on the news and in comments sections they think the cars that burn are selected by random. They’re not. They’re messages.

I live in one of the so called ghettos. It is a challenge but I am having it easy because I am a very big dude and I’m considered pretty normal. I thought I’d just show you some perspective from someone actually living in one of the “danger zones”.

First of all there are sub zones within the media’s perspective of the danger zones. In Biskopsgården there are places that clearly is outright dangerous to even be in while some are quite nice with a view over the danger zone.

The funny thing is that Biskopsgården is really beautifully located with a lake and football fields. It is really beautiful. We also have to make it clear to whom it is a danger zone. The entire area in Biskopsgården is a danger zone to the police and LGBT people but to most normal males you won’t really notice much if you aren’t a very frightened person like most Sweden Democrats that would shit themselves if a man with a turban walked on the sidewalk with them. I will make a danger list at the end of this post for y’all really scared people. If you’re like that then you’d have a heart attack looking at the danger zone.

I live in the part with the view of the local danger zone and there are quite a lot of shady people in the danger zone. With the local danger zone I mean it would even be risky for me to walk in there without a translator because drugs build up a certain parameter in that area and ask the wrong questions and you are really playing with fire. You don’t even have to try to find them. They are obvious and have a special way they move among people. You also see all the drug delivery vehicles (moped and such) and they don’t even try to hide the scent of cannabis.

Many of my friends are actually immigrants because almost everyone here is. My friends are from different places and the most liberal of them are from richer families from Iran and the most radical have rich family roots in Saudi Arabia and even he thinks that his culture’s view on women is a disgrace to all human beings and that they have too much influence on the Muslim community that is harming the faith. True, they cannot represent all the immigrants from Iran and Saudi Arabia but I’m just saying they are pretty sane Muslims.

When we walk around they usually translate to me what is going on because quite frankly Swedish is not even a language within close proximity of the danger zone. My friends know Persian, Arabic, German and Swedish so I get a whole new perspective of what’s going on when they translate to me in German because no other Muslims in the area know German so they don’t expect anything. We use German just to be sure. The funny thing is though that just like some Swedes look funny upon people talking Arabic on the tram when they don’t understand we get a lot of funny looks and sometimes even comments in Arabic when we are using German.

The main problem here is how much influence this danger zone gets on the surroundings. Muslims further away from the danger zone would be considered a lot more normal while the closer you get to the epicenter you have ISIS within those walls. I’m not even kidding, ISIS is right there and most of us could point them out and according to rumors SÄPO do have the building under supervision. To be able to talk you’d have to grow the biggest balls ever seen and be willing to move as soon as you spill it out.

The problem is that the amount of fear that the epicenter emits makes a lot of the Muslims around feel threatened and like they’re bad Muslims. One of my friend’s mother who lives closer to the epicenter has told me that she is more scared in her home in Sweden than she ever was in Iran, because in Iran she would at least live with her kind of Muslims and the Swedish immigration board don’t seem to understand the difference.

One of her relatives had to live with people that had physically abused a woman in Iran who was her friend, and she tried to bring up that she feared for her life and that the men looked at her as if she was prey. Now they shared the same camp and she was scared to death while she was waiting to gain access to the Swedish system.

Anyway, my friend’s mother has to live in fear due to her being a woman and not having much of an education. We don’t have anything to offer these women in Sweden and hence they become even more victimized and she told me that many of her friends rely on their men to bring home income, which makes the radical ideas keep on prospering because women don’t have a voice and say if they want to survive. There are simply no homes for either Swedes or immigrants who don’t feel safe in their own home so my friend’s mom is going to live her entire life in fear and die in fear if she don’t find the money to move back to Iran. Now if that isn’t the most heartbreaking thing you’ve heard in a long time you have a pretty shitty life my friend.

She says that it is an unfair amount of pressure on her to live right by the Quran while a lot of men can get away with a lot of things you shouldn’t do according to the more radical in the bunch. She is under more pressure to live right than she ever was in Iran. She has wanted to become a feminist and join a union and that was something she was looking forward to in Sweden but she wouldn’t feel safe doing that even though such a union is made for people to feel safe.

You can even see that even though Swedes can’t say that females in this area are actually one of the entire WORLDS most oppressed women that a lot of agencies understand that they have to do something. Almost everywhere you see signs of phone numbers to female support groups and hotlines for domestic abuse. On buses, bus stops, road signs etc. I have even taken a picture of a sign from Amnesty right in that neighborhood addressing the oppression of women. Dude, a sign from Amnesty in Sweden. So it is realized in some sense but we aren’t doing enough and taking proper responsibility since they still live in fear.

The closer I get to the epicenter the more you will hear of the topic that the angry foreigner is talking about. It doesn’t seem to be linked to a gender so at least there’s some equality. Okay, I really shouldn’t joke about that but there’s no difference from what I have heard if a man is a homosexual or a woman but I could be wrong. However, both seem to lose their human rights.

The further away you get from the epicenter the more most Muslims act like most Swedes. We Swedes kinda say we accept homosexuality but deep down a lot of people outside of the cities would still question it behind your back. However, in the epicenter it is not uncommon to hear both women and men talk about how Allah will punish the homosexuals. The radicals don’t even hide it because they are in fact PROUD of that opinion. They see themselves as the perfect Muslims. They say it clear in the open because they don’t fear anything and most people don’t even speak Swedish. If an outsider come into the area you have to have a translator to be able to hear what they’re saying right there clear in the open.

They even discuss daughters that don’t bleed during their wedding night and how ashamed families should be if that happens. I once heard that they “knew a guy who could surgically make their daughters bleed on the weeing night to uphold the family’s honor”. I mean these are to most normal people considered really radical thoughts but they seriously talk about it on a bench by the playground while their kids are on the swings 10 feet away.

The closer to the male teenagers you get the more they feel like they are messengers of Allah and they have the right to according to my friend’s translation “teach homosexuals to cure themselves and save those who aren’t infected”. A lot of radical women also take pride in a radical man so sadly the behavior is in some sense encouraged by the radicals in this wheel of a fucked up life.

It really is a different world near the epicenter. You can’t bring a camera or pretend you are showing something, doing a documentary or being suspicious because then they will show that you are not welcome. By show I mean they will break your shit. Me and my friends usually pretend we are passing through to get a pizza or something and that works most of the time. The most common thing though is that most people that we’d consider normal live in fear no matter the religion if you are close to the epicenter.

The police is increasing their presence but the problem is that near the epicenter they don’t believe in the police. Most don’t even believe in each other and are racing to be the best Muslims. The criminals dealing in drugs believe they are invincible and the victims and witnesses don’t believe in the police to protect them if they were to speak up.

Near the epicenter everything is ruled by fear and Allah happens to be a quite common tool to enforce their laws. A lot of times you hear talk about “being a proper Muslim”. That seems to be very important. It is like this race to be the best Muslims there ever was. So in some sense radicals gain ground by saying that they know the path of becoming the best Muslim and many in the younger generations look upon them with awe. It’s insane and the fact that this is so clear in the open and that homophobic ideals is talked about as common as the weather is crazy.

I’ve seen multiple newspapers in Sweden mention this now even before the angry foreigner did but to me and us living here it’s old news. It might be news for y’all living outside of these areas but ever since I moved to Gothenburg homophobia has always been there in Biskopsgården.

So when news come that teenagers are acting upon these things they have heard their entire life even by the playground it’s not a surprise. In fact I’m surprised we haven’t seen an attack on the pride festival yet. However, we also have to be realistic here. It’s not thousands that are throwing rocks, sending messages by burning cars and beating women. It’s a small percent but that doens’t make it any more right or acceptable but those actually acting the radical ideas out are very few. A lot more people share many of these radical ideas but they don’t physically act on them and break the law.

Even though the news mention the entire area of Biskopsgården it’s not as bad in the edges as the epicenter that I’ve explained here. It is livable for a male. When cars have been burning it is not like I fear for my life because even though it looks crazy on the news it’s a message and if the police show up the anger is only directed at the police due to the teenagers not believing in the police.

I have never seen a fat radicalized middle-aged Muslim male throw rocks at the police in Sweden. It is the radicalized teenagers and those engaged in criminal activity that believe they can carry out these acts. That’s the one time I see the radical Muslims and criminals join forces. To throw rocks at the police. #ComingTogether

I’d be afraid if I was (I put them in order as well to give you an idea how afraid you should be, feel free to combine them how you please but remember to double the fear for you first addition and triple for you second and so on):

1. A woman

2. A homosexual/Transexual

3. A feminist

4. A parent

5. A police

6. A nurse

7. A teacher

8. An Imam

9. A politician

10. A racist

Imagine being a homosexual woman with a kid being a police officer by day and an Imam by night. No, I’m just kidding. I know that’s ridiculous. That would never exist.

However do notice that by just being male you are a lot safer than our poor females that we contentiously let down in these areas. So even though you are scared from what you see on the news and you write an angry comment, you are blessed compared to the real oppressed in this country.”

Sex crimes in Sweden – Can you teach men not to rape?

RAPE

A myth circulating the internet states that in Sweden the majority of rapes are assault rapes, and that this is due to immigration from muslim countries.

First things first: It is true that immigrants are overrepresented when it comes to rape. A study by the Crime Prevention Council (BRÅ) from 1996 showed they were 4 times more likely to be registered for the offense, and this primarily concerning immigrants from arab countries. A follow-up study from 2005 more or less confirmed the results of the previous one, and so have studies from Denmark and Norway.

However, both Swedish reports showed that the majority of immigrants (85-88%) weren’t registered for crimes what so ever. These numbers shouldn’t be used to smear an entire group of people, they should be used to highlight problematic tendencies so we can counteract crime. If you want a further analysis of these statistics you can watch the video I did on this topic, I go over it extensively there.

There is truth to the notion that immigrants rape more than Swedes. My personal estimation is that approximately half of all rapes in Sweden are conducted by the immigrant minority which makes up 20% of the population. It’s also true that immigrants are more likely to be convicted of crimes due to stereotypes and prejudice within the justice system, but I don’t think that’s enough to explain the overrepresentation.

However, it’s also problematic when statistics get misinterpreted and blown out of proportion to the point where it’s ridiculous. It’s blatantly untrue that 77% of rapists are muslims, and the majority of rapes in Sweden are not assault rapes.

It’s said that 63% of all rapes are committed by a total stranger. This is the result of a misunderstanding. The number is pertaining to “sexual crimes”, a label which includes things like rape, flashing, prostitution, trafficking, molestation, sexual coercion and child pornography.

rapereserc

In 63% of the sexcrimes, the perpetrator was completely unknown to the victim, in 25% of the cases the perpetrator was an acquaintance, and in 11% of the cases the perpetrator was a closely-related person.

34% of sexcrimes were considered severe enough to the point where they would qualify as attempted, or completed, sexual coercion or rape. The safety study also makes sure to clarify that sexcrimes which occur in the home, or by someone the person knows, are very likely to be underreported in a study such as this. At the same time, the reported number of sexcrimes where the perpetrator is someone you know is 36% – remember, 25% acquaintance and 11% closely-related.

Thus it is entirely possible that the remaining 2/3 of sexcrimes – which aren’t rapes – are primarily those where the perpetrator is unknown. Do also keep in mind that assault rapes and stranger-sexcrimes are not the same, one other report from BRÅ states that 12% of all reported rapes in Sweden are assault rapes. This is along the same line as public statements made by the police – it’s a minority, not a majority.

Page 10 in a different report about how rape is handled in the legal system states that, more than anything, the suspects are most often someone you have a relationship to – whether it’s someone close like a boyfriend, or someone more shallow like a classmate.

Add to this the fact that assault-rapes are more often reported than rapes by someone close to the person, for obvious reasons. It’s not very easy to report someone that you know as a figure in your day-to-day life, especially if the rapist is a respected member in the community. Some fear not being believed, and some simply don’t want to stir up controversy in their social circle. Imagine having to tell all your friends that the well-liked good-looking guy they all know raped you. Yeah, it’s not a fun thing to do.

Also, since the rape wasn’t brutal and violent the victim might try to rationalize that it wasn’t ”that bad” to save themselves from the traumatic experience. Here’s one account, another, yet another, and one by a man – They all display the same repeating pattern and the reaction is gender neutral. The man describes how he was drugged and raped at a party, and kept dating her afterwards – because the idea of being raped, as a man, was so horrible that he pushed it away and acted like it wasn’t a big deal.

Acquaintance rape victims also tend to blame themselves more, especially if alcohol was involved. Being attacked by a madman in a park sort of takes away the whole aspect of: ”Did I do something to lead him on?” So all in all, acquaintance rape victims are overall less likely to speak out, seek help and tell the authorities. All the talk about “women’s responsibility to avoid rape” probably keeps women from reporting as well.

The amount of unreported rapes, according to Sweden’s Crime Prevention Council, are 90% and it’s assumed that these are primarily acquaintance rapes. It is thus most likely that the saying about how most rapes are done by someone the victim knows isn’t at all a lie. The numbers indicate that it’s primarily “ordinary” men who rape, and not maniacs hiding in bushes.

People don’t understand that a typical rapist is a typical person

He’s an ordinary guy. Or at least he appears to be an ordinary guy. On the inside there is nothing ordinary about him, but on the surface there’s nothing differentiating him from other men when it comes to everyday appearance, behavior and social relations. It can be someone good-looking, or ugly, a loner, or a popular guy with many friends, single, or with a girlfriend, unemployed or in a prestigious profession.

So when someone drags up consent classes as a possible tactic towards rape, and you reply by saying ”Im a nice guy who would never do anything bad”, it really doesn’t mean anything. Most rapists are seemingly nice guys, and certainly see themselves in that light.

A study was done where nearly 1900 college students were asked four questions to determine if they had ever raped someone, or attempted to rape someone, but the study never used the word “rape”. And 120 men, meaning 6%, answered yes. A similar study which surveyed 86 male college students found similar results.

It turns out that as long as the word rape isn’t used, rapists will self-report. Because the word rape is taboo, and most typically rapists do not view what they did as rape.

If the immigrant minority which makes out 20% of Sweden’s population are responsible for half of all rapes, then that means Swedish rapists make out the other half. This is easy to forget when discussing rape, but it would be intellectually dishonest to ignore this and only focus on immigration.

Every so called “women’s issue” is also a man’s issue, because women raise us. They become our sisters, friends and girlfriends. I care about the rape issue because I care about the safety of women, not because I wanna use it as a cheap case against immigration.

In my video about immigrant rape statistics I concluded that there are several solutions to the problem, one being higher demands for assimilation, and the other being consent classes – both for newly arrived migrants as well as swedish youths (meaning both young boys and girls) as part of their general sex education.

This caused certain people to get upset and try dismissing me as a radical feminist. The usual objections took place, which is why I eventually decided to do a video on the topic of consent classes in general.

Everyone knows it’s bad to rape

Saying “everyone knows rape is bad” as a counter-argument is meaningless. The stereotypes of rape are so widespread in society people even become confused when you explain that someone can be raped by a boyfriend, and that violence doesn’t have to be present. They will downplay and say that it isn’t “rape-rape”, despite the fact that rape is simply defined as sex against your consent. The word “rape” is so ridden with misconceptions and taboo that not even the people who force others to have sex with them would use “rape” to describe what they’re doing.

The myths about rape, in practice, give rapists a social license to operate. They allow the perpetrator to hide in plain sight. To rape someone and still stay in the same social circle because she won’t tell anyone, since what happened doesn’t fit the sensationalist stereotype of sexcrime.

The unspoken pact to make excuses for what happened, look for mitigation or patch things over, so you can keep believing that what the people we know do to each other isn’t “rape-rape”. Since it wasn’t violent, and she didn’t fight and scream, it couldn’t be “rape-rape”. Making sure that you have it as comfortable as possible when you don’t have to ponder the possibility that a person you’re fond  of could be capable or something terrible.

The general publics ignorance about rape and what the average perpetrator looks like, is one of the reasons why the majority of sexual assault goes unreported. The stereotype of a rapist enables rape. This is especially true when it comes to child rape. When our society keeps the myth alive that it’s primarily the no-good muslim nigger or the dirty loser who doesn’t have any friends, that’s when a nice 41-year old teacher is given the leeway with a 14-year old victim.

How often don’t we hear the same thing repeated whenever someone gets caught for fucking kids? Interviews with the community saying ”oh we never would have thought that about him, he’s so nice, and shy, and tender. He’s so good with the children, they all like him. He’s not a black monster.”

This myth of the perpetrator makes it possible for the perpetrator to find his victim, and many times the parents just leave the prey over to directly to him. No parent would leave their child in the care of a dirty gypsy, yet they think it’s perfectly fine with the 41-year old nice good-looking teacher, or the enthusiastic camp leader. If you don’t know about the bad things in this world, they can creep up on you.

If men are a part of the problem then men can be a part of the solution. We need to talk about this and acknowledge the fact that rape is a much more complex issue than “those brown people are bad and it’s all about foreign culture, but when whites do it it’s just because they’re psychopaths”.

No, rapists aren’t necessarily psychopathic or suffering mental illness. You look at various studies done on incarcarated rapists and the number of psychopathic offenders vary from approximately 5% to 60% depending on the type of offender.

PSYCHO

Also, the mere fact that the term ”non-psychopathic offender” is used in rape research and statistics should tell you something. One study also concluded that rapists actually have more empathy towards women in general than nonsexual offenders, and the same degree of empathy as nonsexual offenders towards rape victims at the hands of other men. The study concluded that rapists may suppress empathy primarily towards their own victim rather than suffer from a generalized empathy deficit.

In my video about consent education I mention a Swedish book by a crime journalist who interviewed sentenced rapists. In one of the chapters, the author met a woman who had a rapist in her social circle. He had been sentenced by the court for having raped and beaten his former girlfriend, yet numerous friends of hers had dated him throughout the years. They refused to accept that he had raped someone, because according to one of the women: ”It’s just impossible, because he’s good in bed.”

That’s how fucking retarded people are. They think that if someone is a rapist then they’re ALWAYS raping, 24/7, every single time they end up alone with a woman. They’re totally incapable of seeing nuance and understanding the psychological complexity of human beings.

It’s completely possible for a person to be capable of tenderness as well as horrible violence. People wear many different hats throughout their lives; Father, son, librarian, firefighter, caregiver, thoughtful, arrogant, foolish.  We can be any combination at any measure.  What I’m saying is that he could be a caring, funny husband while at the same time being a rapist.  Loving to most people, and cruel to others. Evil does not have a face.

Now, the problem with sex education is that it often only deals with the biological aspects of sex, and not the psychological and social ones. Talking about pregnancy and contraception is great, but don’t stop there. Go on to cover the importance of boundaries, the unrealistic expectations porn creates, how consent works, the different faces of sexual assault.

Teach students that nobody else is allowed to define your needs and what makes you feel unsafe. That’s what people need to talk more about, what healthy sexual relations look like.

And even if it might not reach through to those in the risk-zone of becoming a perpetrator, it would at least educate the general public on how it all works so we can create a society that’s more supporting of victims, instead of hounding the shit out of them because their experiences don’t suit your ignorant prejudice about sexual assault. Steubenville wasn’t unique to America, we’ve had cases like that here in Sweden as well.

The reason I think there’s something to consent education is that they tried it in Kenya, and it gave results. Acquaintance rape dropped by 20%, and the amount of boys thinking that miniskirts were inviting them to have sex dropped by 50%.

Now, Kenya is a backwards fucking country. If you can take a country that backwards and get them to stop raping after just a few classes, imagine what could happen in a more developed country like Sweden or America? I really don’t think we should underestimate what can happen when people get together and talk. It also shows that rape can be the result of skewed perspectives, and that’s something you can change.

But of course, just sex ed on it’s own isn’t going to solve everything. This is just one step of many that need to be taken to eliminate sexual assault. Another step is more scientific research.

The little research that’s been done indicates that what creates a rapist is not one single factor or experience, but a combination of different factors contribute to the development of predatory behavior in a young person. Like for example social inadequacy, various types of exclusion, low self-esteem, attachment issues, family dynamics, violence in the family, and lacking social competence. One study also demonstrated that rape is 2x more likely in societies where gender inequality is normalized.

These factors aren’t automatically going to turn someone into a rapist, but they’re commonly reoccuring. There needs to be more research done to reach more conclusive conclusions.

Last, but certainly not least

A frequent objection I see is: ”Consent classes is one of the biggest feminist insult to a man’s intelligence, especially to a western man.”

First of all, these classes should be for both men and women. Only focusing on men as perpetrators wouldn’t be very inclusive since men can be raped, whether by women or boyfriends, and women can be raped by women as well. Consent is a matter of person-to-person interaction, not gender.

Second of all, who gives a fuck if you think it’s an insult? Your feelings are not an argument. If you’re truly serious about stopping rape then you wouldn’t have a problem sitting in a classroom for 2 hours. If you really care about fixing the issue you wouldn’t have a problem thinking: ”I know this doesn’t apply to me personally but maybe other people aren’t as smart, and there’s no way to know for sure just by looking which person might be in the risk-zone, so I’ll just take one for the team here.”

The feelings of offended men are not worth more than the security of women, for the same reason that the feelings of offended muslims and christians aren’t worth more than freedom of speech. There are certain virtues we as a society need to uphold. And catering to the offended is not one of them.