No, Fox News and Trump aren’t lying about Sweden

afton

Aftonbladet is probably the biggest newspaper in Sweden. When Donald Trump mentioned what happened “last night in Sweden” they were quick to mock him, and soon followed up with a serious article attempting to debunk Ami Horowitz documentary Stockholm Syndrome.

It’s just a shame it’s full of fallacies.

Let’s begin.

Claim: “Weapons crime and rapes have risen since Sweden opened its borders.”

Aftonbladets reply: In 2015 there were 5 290 reported rapes, a 12 percent decrease compared to 2014.

As you can clearly see in their own linked source, sex crimes have doubled since 2012. They decreased a little in 2014, only to rise again in 2015. So the way they selectively pick and choose here is devious. I’d also like to mention that women’s comfortability with reporting sex crime has actually gone down.

img_0504

 Source for diagram is ”Utsatthet och anmälningsbenägenhet brott mot enskild person 2005-2015”, when you open it in Excel scroll to the far right.

Also, please do note that my sources here are the Swedish Crime Councils “safety surveys”. They are generally considered more reliable than reports to the police, and this also means that factors like the definition of rape widening and taking time to apply in court isn’t relevant here. Asking citizens what they’ve experienced and looking at people who dared to report are different things.

Aftonbladet go on to say: According to the authorities 13 percent of the Swedish population was subject to a criminal act in 2015. In comparison with 2014 that’s an increase, but approximately the same as 2005. According to a report from Brå 2015, leathal violence has decreased in Sweden the past years.

Lethal violence has decreased since the 90’s, but attempted murder has increased. (Chart below)

mordforsok_1975_2010

The reason for this appears to be that medical emergency services have gotten better at saving people. And when the media happily reports about drops in violence it’s referring to limited periods of time, where it does indeed drop. Both attempted murders and murders have remained relatively stable the past 10 years though, however in 2014-2015 there was a 29% increase of lethal violence.

What we can see is that since the 90’s there’s less violence towards children, especially within the family, and less alcohol-related deadly violence. But there’s an increase in lethal violence from criminals who seek retribution over beef. The number of crimes with illegal guns have increased, and square-offs have moved out into the streets.

One example of this is the guy who, during a conflict with another criminal, fired a submachine gun in front of a school. Children were running away scared. This isn’t exactly the typical thing you’d see in Sweden 20 years ago.

It’s now more common that perpetrator and victim don’t know each other, and the biggest victims of this type of crime are individuals from ghettos. In 9 years, gun violence has increased by 84%. One study in 2012 showed that 76% of gang members are first- or second generation immigrants.

And in a different article from the very same newspaper, Aftonbladet, they say murders in Sweden are increasing. They interviewed an expert who claimed that what we’re seeing is trend break. 105 victims during 2016 thus far, this number might increase after police finish investigating suspected murders. The official stats from the Crime Council don’t come out until spring.

Also, do note the following statistics from the correctional facility, during 1997-2009, page 28: 47% of prisoners serving long-time sentences were born in Sweden and still Swedish citizens. 13,1% came from a different country but became citizens, and the remainder aren’t Swedish citizens. In other words, 53% of prisoners serving long-time sentences have a foreign background.

In short: The increasing violence poses the biggest threat towards other immigrants living in these rough neighborhoods. Not upper-middle class Swedes.

Claim: “Refugees are behind the rise of crime, but authorities are not disclosing theses facts.”

Aftonbladets reply: There are no statistics to support this statement. When it comes to people being convicted for crimes, Brå does not regularly investigate their ethnicity.

Of course there’s no statistics to support this statement, when the government stopped carrying statistics in 2005. Probably because they didn’t like the results that were showing. The police even got a special code in 2015 to keep all crimes pertaining to migrants secret.

The latest report (from 2005) hinted at severe overrepresentation, immigrants were 5.5 times more likely to be registered as suspects of rape. When the overrepresentation is that high, rapes will increase by a lot as that part of the population grows as well.

Most immigrants don’t rape. But with an overrepresentation like that, they don’t have to in order for a lot of rapes to occur.

Norway and Denmark found similar numbers, and a police report in 2016 showed 80% of sex attacks in bathing houses were by newly arrived migrants.

Aftonbladet goes on to say: On the other hand, there is a report from 2005 that shows that people born outside of Sweden are more likely to be suspects in crimes compared to people being born in Sweden. According to the liberal web site Migrationsinfo.se, it has to do with conditions related to their home country, standard of living in Sweden and discrimination within the court system.

That’s nonsense. BRÅ themselves literally stated on page 21 in their report that after checking for socioeconomical factors the overrepresentation largely remained, meaning that you can’t use segregation or low social status as an excuse anymore.

On page 23 it says that it’s reasonable to assume discrimination might exist, but if so it only accounts for a minor part of the equation. And page 9 explains that registered criminality varies between ethnic groups. Americans, Western Europeans and South-East Asians have the lowest registered crime, while those from the MENA-region have the highest. If racism really was the deciding factor, why aren’t Asians and Indians more prevalent in the statistics?

Claim: “160 000 refugees arrived in Sweden 2016.”

Nope. Aftonbladet point out that in 2016, 30’000 people applied for refugee status but in 2015, 163’000 applied. This is correct, and in 2016, 111,979 people learned the outcome of their applications.

Claim:Of the refuges that arrived in Sweden 2016, only 500 are working.”

Aftonbladet admit to this being true, adding: “It depended – among other things – on the fact that the authorities didn’t prioritize employment when the wave of immigrants was at its peak.”

And: “In addition to residence and education, the asylum seekers are receiving one of the state’s most generous financial allowances.”

I have no idea why they are boasting about this. Our generous welfare is the reason migrants kept traveling to Sweden even after they had arrived in Denmark for safety, and when interviewed by the media they blatantly say it’s because of bigger welfare checks. Does that sound like an asylum seeker, or a luxury seeker?

Claim:There are no-go zones in vulnerable suburbs where the police don’t want to enter because it’s “too dangerous”.”

Aftonbladet write: In February 2016, the police released a report listing the most vulnerable suburbs in Sweden. That was the beginning of the term “no go-zones” being used. But it wasn’t used in the report, and it’s not true the police are too afraid to enter these areas.

Ok, so this is a pretty funny one. State media SVT recently interviewed a cop who said that there is no such thing as no-go zones; since certain areas are so problematic that the police is needed there constantly.  ….Does that sound like safe areas to you?

The interview is in English – since Swedish journalists are now working hard to change the image of Sweden abroad – and they even admit to there being over 50 areas where the police and ambulances get attacked by residents when they travel inside, where many people don’t dare become witnesses for the police, and where there are parallell structures in place that replace society’s legal structures – all of these things are true.

But they still don’t wanna call it a “no go zone”, because technically they still travel inside. If you ask me, this is just an annoying game of semantics.

With “no go zones” you’re not trying to say that some places are impossible to visit for everyone at all times. It’s enough that there’s neighborhoods under such high control by criminals that ambulances and firetrucks can’t enter without police escort. The ambulance union demanded riot gear to be able to do their job, for christ sake.

In Seved the post office refuses to hand out packages due to safety reasons. In Tensta they haven’t had a meter maid for 8 months, because they’re afraid to go there. The same thing with journalists visiting Bäckby, Husby, Rinkeby, etc, they get attacked for holding up cameras.

The point isn’t that these neighborhoods are impossible to enter. The point is that non-locals percieved as “intruders” get attacked, and these areas are highly problematic to the point where you start wondering who’s in charge: the cops or the criminals?

Not to mention that there are certainly areas where the cops don’t even travel inside. Jacob Ekström is a police officer who works in the notorious ghettos Rinkeby and Kista, and when interviewed by F&F he literally says: “If we hunt a car it can drive to certain adresses in Tensta where a lone cop car can’t pursuit – because it will result in stone throwing or riots. Those are no-go areas. We can’t reach those.”

The area Koppargården in Landskrona once had a single officer surrounded by 50-70 people who acted very threatening. He pulled his gun to defend himself and the tension got real ugly. They spat him in the face and cussed him out while he called for backup, and when 10 police patrols arrived they didn’t even drive into the area. They stuck around outside of Koppargården, because they were afraid to start a riot. A single cop had to go inside and the two mutually calmed down the masses so they could escape.

Now tell me: How would you describe an area like this?

It is intellectually dishonest to act like Sweden doesn’t have messed up ghettos. The police report in it’s entirety can be read here. They describe how there’s areas where criminal gangs exercise a large amount of influence over the neighborhood, and how it makes life miserable for all the residents there – who are mainly immigrants. These people aren’t helped by Swedish journalists trying to downplay the issue.

I’m certainly not a fanboy of Trump, there are lots of things I don’t agree with him on politically. But I’m not a fan of our mainstream-media either. This is the type of lazy agenda-driven reporting that makes them lose trust with the people.

I hope you enjoyed this read.

Sincerely,

Angry Foreigner

Trump mockery goes viral, but Lövin is a hypocrite

faggot1

Sweden recently came in the spotlight when minister Isabella Lövin mocked Donald Trump.

This picture was widely praised online and became international news when Huffington Post, BBC, The Guardian, and even Miley Cyrus picked this up and celebrated it as a feminist action. And of course Swedish media went crazy over this international recognition as well.

The problem is just the disgusting amount of hypocrisy involved in this, and sadly many people who have read those “feminist praise” articles will never know about it.

The picture, which she uploaded on both Twitter and Facebook,  shows our Climate and Humanitarian Aid Minister Isabella Lövin surrounded by female colleagues as she signs a proposal for new climate laws that aim to “reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” When interviewed by the media she proudly says that “We are a feminist government”.

Interesting. Because this is the same woman who decided to cut back on humanitarian aid in 2015 and 2016.

8 billion SEK, which is 1/5 of the aid budget, was taken out and spent on asylum immigration instead. And the majority of those refugees are men. So let’s clarfiy: She made sure that refugee women abroad got less access to food, clean water and schooling so she could finance reception of migrant men in Sweden. How is this feminist?

The red cross food package can last a family in a refugee camp for a whole month, and it costs 385 SEK. However, every new refugee in sweden costs 499 SEK per day. I think you can imagine the humanitarian disaster here. Yet, when interviewed by SVT, she explains that she finds this “morally justifiable”.

Also, do keep in mind that the governments immigration policy made sure that Sweden now has a bigger gender imbalance than China. For the first time since 1749 men are the majority in Sweden, and it’s predicted this will have negative consequences. 

Professor Valerie Hudson explains how this leads to increase in violence towards women, increase in crime in general, much easier recruiting into criminal gangs, a more constrained lifestyle for women, and a rise in demand for trafficking.

Also, marginalised men without partners tend to gather in gangs and such groups are more likely to conduct in risky, deviant behavior. Group harassment and molestation is just one example of what this entails. In other words, what happened in Cologne on New Years Eve might just be the beginning. She explains how this has a direct correlation.

Our Swedish feminists want to put quotas on parental leave insurance (so more men stay home with the kids), corporation boards, the fire department, movie directors, etcetera. They are willing to put quotas on everything – but not immigration?

In 2016 the government also cut down on humanitarian aid for various health organisations that combat aids, tuberculosis and malaria. These organisations were already promised 300 million, but when that money suddenly disappeared 159 organisations chose to protest.

According to calculations by the Global fund, the result of this suspended funding is 20’000 more deaths and almost one million people becoming infected with HIV, tuberculosis and malaria. Once again, this was the decision of our feminist government.

So let me ask you: Who is the worst one here? The man who makes it harder for women to have abortions, or the woman who makes it harder for women to eat?

I do not support either. I think Trump’s decision was dumb, but I absolutely cannot stand the holier-than-thou attitude from privilege princesses who hardly give a shit about women. Especially immigrant women.

The National Board of Health revealed that 40’000 girls in Sweden have suffered genital mutilation. Another government agency discovered 70’000 youths in Sweden worry about being married off against their will.

A left-wing politician who runs an organisation that combats honor culture did a youth poll in the immigrant-dominated suburbs of Stockholm, and this is the result: 83% of girls aren’t allowed to have guy friends, 81% of boys feel it’s their duty to make sure the sister doesn’t “shame” their family, 54% of girls aren’t allowed to spend the night at class trips because their parents worry they might have sex, and 73% of girls weren’t allowed to have sex before marriage.

Here’s the kicker: It’s been like this since the 90s, and it’s only gotten worse with the years. This type of betrayal towards womens safety is something you would expect from the Islamic State. Not the Swedish state.

Sweden even has hospitals who contribute to honor culture and single women in asylum camps are being raped, beaten and threatened by islamists. Don’t believe me? Check the hyperlinks, those Swedish documentaries have English subtitles. (Turn on CC in bottom right corner)

And it doesn’t stop when you get older either. Most senior-citizens living in poverty are women and half of all women in Sweden become poor when they retire. And since the feminist governments budget reform in 2016, the weak got poorer. They claimed they were raising pensions yet many got less money in their wallet, and assisted living got more expensive. Thus it hit the poor and the female the hardest.

Sweden is neither a feminist nor a socialist utopia. So can we please cut the crap? I do not agree with what Donald Trump did, but considering the way Swedish government treats women both abroad and domesticaly, you really need to shut up. You are not in the position to preach.

The Guardian let Isabella Lövin write an article saying that Trump needs to learn from Sweden. Well, tell me this. Can you seriously watch this video down below, the entire thing, and still tell me that the world should “learn from Sweden”?

I think not.

UPDATE: Isabella Lövin blocked me after I sent her the video and called her a hypocrite.

The nazi punch that echoed around the world

Alt-right leader Richard Spencer got punched on live TV: 

I’m so tired of seeing people celebrate this retarded stunt.

First of all, I can’t believe the amount of people cheering over a sucker punch. Quite possibly the most cowardly way you can attack someone, and people let their morals out the window as soon as it happens to someone they dislike.

They are literally cheering on a coward. Spencer was fully immersed in his TV interview when it happened, his guard was down, and the perp ran away like a 5-year old kid.

It wasn’t even that great of a punch. Even with the element of surprise he wasn’t able to knock someone outAnd now we see the progressive feminist left mocking Richard Spencer for being weak and unmanly:

c22eukouoaayx4i

So they’re maintaining the exact same heteronormative macho bullshit they usually claim to be against. Isn’t that interesting? Apparently heteronormativity is only a problem when you can’t use it against someone.

Also note that they never adress how the person who punched Spencer literally is a shit-eating submissive sex-slave: https://alt-right-news.blogspot.se/2017/01/spencer-attacker-revealed-to-be-shit.html (Warning for graphic images)

If you’re gonna talk about manlyness then fucking do it correctly.

Last, but certainly not least, thanks to the punch Richard Spencers popularity soared.

spencer

And if you search “Richard Spencer” on Twitter, all over social media you can see leftists laughing at how funny it is to see “the wicked evil man guy” get physically assaulted. But as usual the feminist left is prioritizing feelings over logic, and this is exactly why you are losing.

A punch is not a counter-argument. A punch will not change someones worldview. And it will certainly not deflate the frustration people feel over what the politicians are doing to your country. All you’ve managed to accomplish is to give a man notoriety, without challenging his ideas. As such, you’ve only furthered the scope of said ideas.

You might think poorly of Richard Spencers vision for a utopian society, but the alternative you’re providing isn’t much better. Reasonable people don’t want to live in a world where you get punched for having unpopular opinions.

Also, it is interesting to see how ANTIFA has spread to America. I see pundits all over the place talking about what a new phenomenon this is, to see violent leftists who actually attack right-wingers. We’ve had them here in Sweden for a long time, and they’re an interesting bunch. They believe that smashing someone’s apartment makes society a better place:

ANTIFA was born as a counter-reaction to nazism. We had a real problem with that in the 90’s here in Sweden, with skinhead gangs running around the streets beating up immigrants for no reason other than blatant racism. So ANTIFA was born as a defense for immigrants and left-wingers who were physically attacked solely for having “the wrong thoughts” or “the wrong skin”. And at one point in time it was actually about fighting back against racism. Now, however, it’s just become it’s own ideology with it’s own fascist tendencies.

You know what the worst part is? I think Richard Spencer is a moron. Seriously, the dude said that only white people deserve to explore space, and that being an immigrant is “pathetic”. He’s literally saying that people running for their lives are pathetic. He’s the epitome of a spoiled, privileged white male. Something that SJWs usually talk about as a fantasy, he actually embodies.

But even with all that in mind, the left is FORCING me to respect him. Because it’s so terribly easy to stand up for your opinion when you got the entire media establishment holding your back. In fact, it’s so easy, that I’m disgusted by how spoiled people are when they don’t understand basic principles like freedom of speech.

If you can’t even provide a counter-argument to Spencers claims, then you’re dumber than he is. Should it really be that hard?

Violence is not the best way to fight racist views, and I suspect that the violent antics from the left is only going to empower the right. Because then they can easily point and show who the most civilized ones are.

No, Angry Foreigner is Not Alt-Right

I do not consider myself alt-right, and I never have. I don’t even consider myself ordinary right-wing. Every political test I’ve done places me left of center, and although Im not interested in labeling myself politically it should at least give testament to people’s misconceptions of me.

Ever since Hillary Clinton’s speech, all of a sudden everyone is defining themselves as alt-right. The term has even spread to Sweden where we, as far as I know, don’t have any alt-right movement online.

We do, however, have a very small anarchocapitalist movement who are  trying to capitalize on the alt-rights growing popularity. They seem to have deluded themselves into thinking they qualify as alt-right, simply because they’re discontent capitalists. I guess that crazy bullshit cult is just hungry for some marketing.

Look, the fact that there’s a couple of confused capitalists in this pile of race realists is irrelevant when the movement as a whole is talking mostly about jews. I’ve seen people write shit like: “The alt-right is just a term for anyone who’s against political correctness and the regressive left!”

No, “alt-right” is not a general term for common sense. The unifying core beliefs of the alt-right is that equality is a dangerous myth, and the dogma that all races are equal needs to be rejected. They are ”race realists” who think that the most important thing you can talk about is the jewish question. They also believe that culture is directly tied to race and biology, which then leads them to draw the conclusion that muslims can never truly change.

And for some reason people think I’m a philosophical ally of the alt-right. Because I reject tolerance for the sake of tolerance, I reject virtue signaling, I hate suicidal ”progressive” policies and the destructive Black Lives Matter movement.

Here’s the thing tho: Anyone with half a brain is against these things. Including many left-wingers. Being against political correctness doesn’t make you special. We can’t give white nationalists patent on common sense.

And when did I ever say that all races aren’t equal? I’ve not once made a video on racial biology. If you consider me a philosophical ally of those guys it’s because you’ve made assumptions about opinions I don’t have.

Here’s the thing about cultures: Western culture is awesome because it allows porn, women can fuck around, countries are largely secular and don’t respect religion, fags and trannies have human rights, or at least many of us are trying to give them equal rights.

There’s a conversation happening about allowing people to step outside of gender norms, and even though feminism goes way too far sometimes, there are sensible feminists as well. There’s also a general respect for freedom of speech in the Western world, even though many SJWs are trying to change that.

Many muslim countries don’t have any of these things. That’s why I criticize them. Because they aren’t progressive.

Now, with the exception of freedom of speech, the alt-right hate these things I mentioned. They hate progressive values. They think slutshaming is biologically defensible, and that traditional gender roles should be enforced on everyone.

They freak out when I wear nail polish, and when I made a video celebrating pornstars and disputing slutshaming they called me a cuck and got REALLY triggered, because I had the nerve to “promote a jewish invention whose purpose is to destabilize Western society”. By that they mean porn.

The alt-right are just as regressive as the radical muslims they despise. They’re essentially right-wing SJWs. Instead of “racist” they just call everyone “cuck”. And while I do agree that insult is funny as hell, and certainly has some merits, they take the definition way too far sometimes. They’ll call someone a cuck just because he isn’t strongly against race-mixing. Black girls are fucking hot, why would any heterosexual male oppose race-mixing? Come on.

And so it becomes kinda weird to see them in my following, since everything I criticize about radical muslims and ethno-masochistic leftists directly applies to them as well. Clearly we have very different views of what Western culture actually is, and what parts of it are worth preserving.

The alt-right is simply a reaction to the SJWs that have been dominating public discourse for so long. Ironically, however, the alt-right are just as collectivist, narrow-minded and bigoted as the SJWs they despise. I’ve seen them get triggered when I make jokes about Hitler, or unfavorable comparisons to Hitler.

Some people are trying to say that the alt-right is a diverse group consisting of many different factions. I call bullshit on that. While it is true that there’s a number of unhappy conservatives present, they are outnumbered by the racists.

The alt-right aren’t joking when they deny the holocaust, praise Hitler and talk about ethnic cleansing with a dash of romance. I know some of the guys are trolling, but there’s way too many who believe that shit for real. And the most progressive people you’re gonna find in that movement are…… Well. Not even Milo Yiannopolous and Gavin McInnes identify as alt-right. I think that says a lot.

Trolling as a political tool

I was reading this article about the alt-right, and I came across a piece about how trolling can be used as a political tool, that I found quite fascinating:

”On the personal side, these folks find trolling progressives online almost orgasmically cathartic; in the longer game, they believe that repeatedly poking communities of so-called “Social Justice Warriors” online makes these sub-communities look so ridiculous in the public gaze that any broad-based support for them will eventually collapse.”

People underestimate the power of trolling. And by that, I mean the actual definition of the term. Here in Sweden the word has become so raped by retarded SJWs who use it to describe literally anyone who doesn’t have 100% politically correct opinions. When established journalists and media are repeatedly using the word this way, the public loses sight of what trolling actually is.

A real troll is someone who argues for opinions they don’t actually have, simply to provoke others. And if you do this the right way you can make others lower themselves to a level which makes them come across as idiots. Partly because they’re buying into it to begin with, and partly because they get so emotionally triggered that they can’t even come up with reasonable counter-arguments.

And when it comes to resistance against political correctness, the biggest problem of all is that people are cowards. Just take the following example, I’ve had this personally told to me as an issue, with people writing me saying that you don’t dare pissing off the rabid feminist in your class, because “what if she gets mad?”

Well duh. That’s exactly what you should be aiming for! Present your opinions in a calm and reasonable manner, and if you’re lucky she’ll get so pissed off that she’ll start roaring. At that point nobody will be able to take her seriously anymore. When someone freaks out because you’re arguing opinions that you can back up with logic, you’ll come across as an enlightened buddha in comparison.

And it doesn’t matter if the thing she’s screaming is “EQUALITYYYYYY!” An ape is an ape. People who are standing around observing the two of you aren’t gonna say it out loud, but they’re gonna feel more compelled to agree with you.

Migrants raped woman in wheelchair – Swedes have had enough

the-filipino-times_two-sharjah-residents-force-wives-into-prostitution

On the 6th of October the police sent extra units to Gotland in order to calm down furious Swedes, after a woman in a wheelchair was gangraped by 5 asylum seekers. The woman reportedly “broke down” after the horrible ordeal.

On the 5th of October cirka 100 people demonstrated in support of the woman. According to one of the demonstrators all of Gotland is currently in shock and many people are crying.

In another seperate incident earler that day, an activist from the national-socialist Nordic Resistance Movement went to the address where the woman was reportedly gangraped, and confronted 3 immigrant males who have been pointed out as suspects. In this videoclip they admit that they’ve been at the police station, but that they were released. Eventually the man lost his temper and shouted: “You are fucking scum! Leave this fucking country you filthy animals!”

Since that day the situation has supposedly escalated, and now special units are being sent there to deal with the locals. So the establishment are spending more resources keeping angry swedes in check, than they do locking away rape suspects from the rest of society.

The 5 men were detained at first but were released on Wednesday. According to the prosecutor the allegations don’t stick since the woman didn’t fight back enough. But of course she didn’t, because she’s in a wheelchair, she CAN’T fight back.

Her lawyer had this to say to Nyheter Idag: “Unfortunately victims of crime will find themselves in a worse position if they didn’t shout, scream, fight, scratch or bite. And partly because of her handicap she isn’t physically strong enough and mobile enough to have been able to escape.”

The men however claim that she wanted to have sex with complete strangers in a bathroom for several hours on end. And apparently the prosecutor chooses to believe this.

So it should come as no surprise that several locals in Gotland got pissed and issued threats towards the prosecutor, investigator, policemen and the suspects. The prosecutor got a “nightly visit” from someone, and the suspects aren’t even in Gotland anymore because of the threat against them. Which technically means they’re free to go somewhere else in Sweden and rape again.

And yet the establishment gets surprised at the anger. The media of Gotland is full of debate articles warning about racism, talking about how people need to calm down, and that Swedish men rape too. A collection can be found below.

This guy worries about racism.

The politicans say that “we need reasonable citizens now”.

This guy is talking about the influence of porn.

The police chief talks about “hate and ignorance”.

This guys draws comparisons to Nazi Germany and says that’s where we’re heading.

Swedish public service media along with “antiracist” organization Expo labels the demonstrators as nazis, or at least “ignorant people who are useful idiots to nazis”.

When the demonstration actually consisted of just plain ordinary people. The elderly, men, women, children, even immigrants. You could see strollers in the crowd of people, for christ sake.

Personally I think it’s about time Swedes get pissed off and speak up against their politicians. A demonstration is good. Everything is better than just sitting at home and being frustrated over the internet.

All our politicans have done thus far is to spit ordinary human beings in the face. They steal the peoples tax money, the result of a life’s hard work, and use it to implement policies that benefit everyone other than the people themselves. Then they call the taxpayers racists because they feel worried that hospitals don’t have enough room for people who need surgery, our senior citizens are living just a tad above street beggars in quality, and bathhouses and music festivals have suddenly become unsafe places for women.

Why should Swedish citizens behave better than Swedish politicans? That the politicans aren’t considered criminals is just a matter of how you want to define things. Their actions are certainly immoral at least, to the highest degree.

It’s not right to take the law into your own hands. That’s why politicans should listen to ordinary people instead of treating them like this. They’ve treated us like shit for far too long now.

On the upside, there is one piece of good news. Kinda.

This is from before the gangrape. The government is currently investigating sharpening up the rape legislation and adding more emphasis on consent, as well as a wording about severe negligence. According to the attorney of the woman in a wheelchair, a change to the legislation such as this would have helped her case if it was already in effect. He would’ve been able to have them detained in police custody and prosecuted.

He says that rape victims who don’t fight back very boldly are disadvantaged in court. The woman clearly said no to each new male who took turns with her, but yet that wasn’t enough. Even though she got injuries that have been documented.

According to him it should be enough: “Research shows that it’s not entirely uncommon that girls become paralyzed and shocked in situations like this, because they’re afraid of being hurt. My client wound up in that category, she became paralyzed. Eventually she gave up on the situation and aimed at just getting out of there alive.”

I agree with him. Swedish law, as it is right now, puts absurd demands on women. You basically have to beat up the perpetrator in order to be able to claim rape, physical resistance is necessary. This despite the fact that the most common reaction is freezing up.

Men are bigger and stronger than women, generally. Their bodies are weapons in their own right, and women are conscious of this. Expecting a frightened woman in a vulnerable position to smack a guy across the jaw, when he hasn’t shown any respect for her boundaries yet, is blatant idiocy. Why would she wanna give him an excuse to hurt her even more?

It’s not at all strange if someone becomes paralyzed in a situation like that. Ultimately it is men who have a special responsibility to be perceptive, not to just go “oh yay free pussy as long as she doesn’t shout loud”.

The new legislation that’s being investigated takes consideration to what reality actually looks like, and the part about “severe negligence” is especially important. It means someone could be convicted of rape without having intent, or premeditation. And the way it’s been the past years is that perpetrators have been able to get off just by claiming that “I thought she wanted it”, even when the girl has said no and the evidence spoke to her favor. But the intent couldn’t be proven.

Of course the rapist doesn’t have intent. Anybody who’s well-read on rapists knows that they rarely view what they do as rape: https://youtu.be/uvUSKkahl3M

They have zero self-distance. Usually they hate rapists as much as everybody else, and they don’t see themselves as rapists. If they happen to get convicted the best answer they can come up with when asked what happened, is “it just happened”. And if they complete therapy then suicide attempts are common, when they gain insight and truly realize what it is they’ve done.

Today the court focuses too much on whether the perpetrator understood or not. With a wording of negligence in the picture you’d be able to focus on the situation at hand, instead of the perpetrators personal view on sex.

What does “blatte” mean? Exploring Sweden’s ghetto culture

My artist name in English is “Angry Foreigner”. In Swedish it’s “En Arg Blatte Talar” which means An Angry Blatte Speaking. Blatte and foreigner don’t carry the same meaning, and when my channel became international I decided to go with something simple because a lot of people in Sweden didn’t understand the sarcasm/satire of my Swedish artist name. Allow me to explain.

“Blatte” for immigrant is what “nigga” is for black people. Chris Rock explained this perfectly.

Back in the 90’s “blatte” was widely acknowledged as an invective. It’s an insulting term meant to describe immigrants who live up to a bad stereotype; rowdy, noisy and refuse to learn the Swedish language because they think it’s cool to be a “gangsta”. Put simply it’s someone who takes pride in not being integrated.

They call female strangers “Swede-whores” and rob Swedish men because it makes them feel cool, not because they need the money to survive. There’s been a few interviews describing how the reason for their mugging is that they want money for partying and fancy brand clothing. Not for food or housing. In other words, it should be impossible for leftists to defend these materialistic reactionary  shitheads, but they still manage in some way.

Blattar will look at Swedish men and find them pathetic because they are civilized human beings who don’t immediately resort to violence to solve verbal conflicts. Blattar will look at Swedish girls and think that they are cheap whores, because they subscribe to Western morality. In other words: Swedish girls dare to have sex before marriage, wear clothing that shows skin and enjoy sex, so because of  this they have less value and are more or less okay to rape. And no, Im not exaggerating. Read the hyperlinks.

Put simply, “blatte” started out as a slur for immigrants who behave badly. But in recent years it has become diluted, normalized and synonymous with the word “immigrant”. So when I made my very first video in Swedish a lot of people misunderstood what I was saying. They thought I was spewing hatred towards immigrants in general, when in fact I was only speaking ill of the immigrants who insist on being stereotypical self-destructive feces.

And let me be really fucking clear on this: As an immigrant I take offense to this minority of disgusting morons making the majority of us look bad.

Do not for a second underestimate the destruction a single pack of these animals can cause. The identity of the blatte is founded upon personal insecurities combined with an exaggerated feeling of cockyness. Blattar seek out physical altercations to assert their dominance, and you can never tell a blatte he’s done something wrong without him exploding and talking about “yo mamas pussy”.

This creature completely lacks self-distance and feels the entire world owes them something. They will constantly demand respect, simply for their mere existence, while not showing anyone even the most basic respect. This is an example of ordinary daily behavior for a blatte,

Blatte: Eyyy you swedish whore, suck me dick, how much u cost?

Girl: You’re a disgusting idiot.

Blatte: YOU FUCKING RACIST

To call passing female strangers whores, and seek out fights over trivialities like someone looking at you for more than 4 seconds, is an everyday routine for this animal. Blattar is one of the reasons why racism is created, because repeated meetings with these singular individuals easily create hatred and prejudice.

It doesn’t matter that 90% of immigrants are decent human beings who don’t commit any crimes. You’re not going to notice them, because they don’t affect your life. They’re normal people. A pack of blattar however will affect you severely, because it’s in the nature of humans to focus on negative experiences more than positive ones. Thus, just having a few encounters with these animals will contribute to someone becoming racist. Whether they want to or not their brain is going to create negative associations to non-Swedes.

blattarrrrr

Why do these type of people exist?

To summarize, Sweden’s immigration policy is about taking in way more immigrants than you can handle, and sticking them all into segregated housing areas, IE ghettos. Sweden being a humanitarian nation is the biggest scam about this country because our politicians couldn’t give a shit less about immigrants. They actively choose to live as far from immigrants as possible.

The result of Sweden’s irresponsible immigration policy is segregation. In the beginning of the 90’s there were 3 ghettos in all of Sweden. Today there’s approximately 186. When you take a shitload of immigrants and let them live together without the presence of any Swedes two things will happen.

1. There is no integration. You’re growing up in an area where you don’t even need to learn Swedish, because you are not surrounded by Swedes. You are surrounded by your countrymen. And thus you will not adapt, because there is no social incentive to do such.

2. A feeling of isolation is born. And in this social vacuum resentment and suspicion will start growing. This article by two politicians from the People Party says it all. They went to schools in some of these areas where ethnic Swedes make out a minority, and talked to the students there. Allow me to translate a few paragraphs.

-“What’s the worst thing you could be called?”
– “A SWEDE!”
The group of immigrants all screamed at once. The few ethnic Swedish youths in the corner of the room didn’t even take notice. This is their everyday life in the Swedish ghettos: Swede-whore, Swede-fag, peasant, Swede-racist, and fucking Swede. Words they hear on a daily basis. Almost every time it’s the same situation when we visit these ghetto schools in Sweden. Students openly display their contempt for what they consider Swedish.

Many youths in these areas don’t feel any connection to Swedishness, but equate it to being cold-hearted and wussy, something you wanna distance yourself from. There’s also an attitude about how female Swedishness is the same as being a tramp with no morals. If an immigrant girl stands up for her rights and lives as freely as guys she is viewed as “Swedeified” by many, which is considered horrendous.”

Both the political Left and Right in Sweden seems to think that the solution to these problems is building more apartments and giving immigrants jobs that don’t exist yet. But if you build more housing it’s going to be primarily immigrants who move there and then we have yet another exclusion area. None of the political parties (except for the Sweden Democrats) want to admit that integration can only work if immigrants are mixed with Swedes, and in order for that to happen you can’t maintain high immigration for years on end.

Take a look at this chart below. It shows the number of car fires and how they’ve increased over the years. Nuff said.

bilbränder

And if you ask me, this situation is also the result of the disgusting rhetoric by the political Left. They constantly talk about “structural racism” in Sweden and act as if this country is so horribly racist that you don’t even stand a chance.

I’ve come across numerous immigrants who honestly said that they don’t see the point in working hard and studying, because “it doesn’t pay off if you’re an immigrant”. The regressive left is destroying the spirits of immigrants in Sweden, making them feel more excluded and turning them against Swedish people.

Can a Swede be a blatte?

A blatte is an immigrant who thinks he’s a gangbanger from Compton. This foreigner comes from, for example, Iraq – lives in Sweden – yet gets his identity from ghetto culture in America. And then he has the nerve to insult assimilated immigrants for having an identity crisis and being “swedified”.

The blatte wrongfully belives he can related to negroes living in Compton, listens way too much to gangsta rap, and watches Scarface way too many times, to the point where he starts idolizing criminality and materialism. Blattar think that the coolest thing you can do is to treat other people like shit, because being kind and responsible is considered to be weakness.

Being a blatte is more about behavior than ethnicity. Blatte simply refers to a person that’s non-Swedish or non-white and acts like a gangsta stereotype. Thus the person can be Arab of African, but also Bosnian or Italian. It is possible for white Swedes to be blattar as well but in that case it’s more appropriate to call them “wannabe-blattar” since we’re talking about a ethnic Swede pretending to be an immigrant pretending to be a gangsta nigga from America.

So why did you choose to call yourself “blatte” as an artist-name?

Because it’s ironic. It’s satire. It’s meant to ridicule immigrants who take pride in stupidity and degenerate behavior.

When you grow up as an immigrant in Sweden you’re aware of other peoples expectations of you. There is a clear perception of what immigrants are “supposed” to be, and if you defy those expectations other immigrants will call you a “swedefied faggot” and a race traitor. You know how many times I’ve been told Im not a “real Bosnian” simply because I listen to satanic metal?

The purpose of my artist name is to mock and destroy peoples perceptions of what an immigrant is “supposed” to be.

“Immigrant” is not a fucking identity, it’s simply something that you do; relocate to a different country. Yet it’s typical for immigrants to associate values and behavior to that label. There’s an idea in society of what an immigrant is supposed to look like, act, and think, and immigrants themselves are the ones upholding this stereotype as if it’s a legitimate identity.

I’ve seen immigrants pretend to have an accent they don’t even have. I’ve seen them pretend to be shittier at speaking Swedish than they really are, just so they appear to be more “immigrant”. I’ve seen people create their sense of self in the conflict of Swedish VS Non-Swedish. It is absolutely pathetic. Be yourself and fuck whatever cultural prison someone else is trying to lock you into.

My artist name is a mockery of the destructive blatte-culture whose morality includes hating police, common sense and decent behavior. I’ve heard of immigrants who’ve been mocked by other immigrants because they try getting good grades in school and learn to speak Swedish properly. Are you seriously gonna tell me that’s not a huge problem?

As an immigrant I feel provoked by what this blatte-culture entails because I do not buy the notion that all immigrants need to be stupid violent macho-caricatures. Do not try to lock me into a box where I am not allowed to explore my own thoughts and feelings. You might expect feminists and leftists to wanna take this fight alongside me, but instead they’re telling me Im the problem.

Immigrants are not a homogenous group. Immigrants can come from all corners of the world. A white American is as much of an immigrant as a black Somalian. Just because you’re born in a different country doesn’t mean you have to be a complete dumbass.

But considering how many people didn’t understand the blatant irony in “En Arg BLATTE talar” I decided to go with something simple when I turned to an English audience. So that’s why I chose to call myself the Angry Foreigner, because it can’t be misinterpreted as wildly.

Perhaps I thought too well of humans when I assumed they’d be able to read between the lines.