Election in Sweden – A Chat with Sargon

I joined Sargon’s channel to discuss the election, explain what our political parties are and the situation at hand. We also get into Skurt, Sweden’s version of Pepe. 😀

Here’s a quick breakdown on Sweden’s parties, this is copied off a comment someone made on the video. I think it gives a fair image:

Left Party (VĂ€nsterpartiet): basically the communist movement in Sweden. Has plenty of radicals with ties to antifa and other left-wing extremists.

The Green Party (Miljöpartiet): Started out as a party concerned about enviromental issues. Has since been infiltrated by islamists. Sometimes tries to argue for various idiotic token efforts regarding the enviroment (like raising taxes on fossil fuels etc.), but it’s evident they don’t really believe what they preach and it’s merely just a method to steal money from people who need to drive a car in their daily life.

The Social Democrats (Socialdemokraterna): Basically the collective efforts of Swedish labour unions in political party form. Used to be protectionist since they realized that Swedish labourers have nothing to gain from mass immigration. But has since been infected with cultural marxism and “progressive” ideals. Basically run by corrupt former labour union representatives.

The Centrist Party (Centrpartiet) basically a slightly more right-leaning version of the green party. Also infiltrated by islamists and multiculturalist fucktards.

The Liberals (Liberalerna): Supposedly free market capitalists, but not really. Very weak number of voters. Also infected with multiculturalism.

The Moderates (Moderaterna): also supposedly free market capitalists. Also infected with multiculturalism. But where the social democrats want multiculturalism so they can create a welfare dependant, immigrant voterbase, the Moderates want mass immigration so that they can undermine labour laws and rights by dumping wages through hiring desperate immigrants and paying them less than Swedish labourers.

The Christian Democrats (Kristdemokraterna): Supposedly “conservatives” but not really. There’s nothing christian about their party profile at all except their name. Can’t decide what to stand for (one day they’re pro-immigration, the next day they’re not). Really weak voter support. Likely to lose their place in parliament.

The Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna): Mostly civic nationalist, loosely ethno nationalist party. Hated by all the other parties and the establishment. The only party with growing support, while the other parties are basically cannibalizing eachother for voters.


WARNING: PeterSweden is an alarmist that can’t be trusted

I recently did a comedy roast of Peter Sweden, a prominent political pundit who claims to be a journalist. He’s been used as a source by Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Paul Joseph Watson, Milo, Mike Cernovich, and others abroad.

And that’s problematic considering how dishonest he is. He exaggerates the image of Sweden to the point where it becomes ridiculous, and as a result people don’t take honest critics seriously. This is a concern for all dissidents speaking out.

Alarmism gives the social justice left ammunition to claim that ”the right” is creating false information to feed their own narrative. Essentially alarmists work as disinformation agents, making it harder for people to accept the real truth once it reaches them.

Put simply: Don’t underestimate how much damage sloppy journalism can accomplish. Letting PeterSweden have a patent on Swedish news is just as problematic as letting a radical leftist represent the image of Sweden internationally.

Honest news about Sweden are hard to find in English. That’s why Peter has managed to get 96’000 twitter followers, and quite a few thousand views on several of his videos.

But Peter isn’t even a journalist.

He just links articles from Sweden’s mainstream media on Twitter. The same media he keeps telling people not to trust. Then he tries to take credit for news that other journalists created. He never even set foot in any of the no-go zones he ”reports” about.


I know he’s traveled to places and interviewed people occasionally, like in this video, but anyone can pick up a camera and do that. That’s not journalism, it’s blogging. The majority of his activity takes place on social media.

Well, here’s some MAINSTREAM MEDIA articles about the handgrenade crisis, which Peter implies nobody but himself talks about. Sources are hyperlinked so just click the blue words to get to the articles.

Grenades being used more frequently amongst criminals. It’s gone from a few detonations per year to a few per month. 21 detonations in 2017, which is lower than 2016, but still alarmingly high to police.

This is reminiscent of the Scandinavian biker wars in the 90s, when Hells Angels and Bandidos fought each other over drug trade. Rocket launchers and grenades were used here as well. Eventually the conflict subsided.

The grenades are 30 years old and originate from the Balkan wars. They are used primarily to scare and extort, not to kill. However, they’ve been found dug into the ground in parks and near roads, and there’s a risk for civilian casualties the more grenades flow into the country.

One of the ”most criminal men in MalmĂ¶â€ planned on using remotely controlled grenades to kill another gangleader. And a grenade was thrown at a villa in nice neighborhood – Why? Because a banker investigating fraud lives there, so you can assume this is about organized crime.

A civilian in his 60’s was killed by accident from picking up a grenade, and police suspect it was a blindwalker thrown by a gangcriminal; meaning a device that didn’t explode as intended. Local shopowner in the ghetto talks about feeling scared after the attack, and another local interviewed says: ”I don’t feel safe anymore. I’ve lived in a country where there’s war and now you’re almost starting to feel like it’s war here. Sweden is broken.”

Police describe how criminal networks are becoming more ruthless towards each other, and careless with civilians. A former criminal told the media: ”When I was active there were certain codes. You don’t attack someone in their home, you don’t go after their families. But that doesn’t apply anymore.”.

You can buy one grenade for 121 dollars, or 1000 SEK. They come for free if you buy guns. ”That can be cool for a young guy who builds up his reputation”, the ex-criminal says. He also thinks the change in aggressiveness is because gang criminality has shifted more towards drug trade, where gangs fight over a market. ”You build up a territory that you have to protect. Then it’s easier to end up in conflict.”

His perception is also that criminals themselves use hard drugs more today, causing the thresholds for violence to lower: ”It’s different pills, like benzodiazepines, that weren’t common in my day. We didn’t do drugs, unless we were partying after a succesful job.”

Today the Swedish police estimates 47 criminal networks in Stockholm. 27 of them are local networks that mainly formed around the members living in the same neighborhood. Between 600-700 people are part of the local networks.

“Right now we have about ten conflicts with risk for lethal violence. The most serious ones are in Rinkeby and Östberga-BredĂ€ng. One of the local criminal networks are in VĂ„rby gĂ„rd, last spring about 15 people were part of that one.”

This confirms what I said in my first video about PeterSweden; It’s not the majority of a ghetto that are criminals. It’s a very small group of friends, who most likely bonded over having similar social issues or backgrounds, eventually shaping a gang.

There’s also a very important point to be made about Sweden’s drug policy. The majority of drug sales are cannabis and everyone knows that’s a relatively harmless drug, on par with alcohol. Other countries are moving more and more towards legalization, because they’ve started listening to the science that’s out there.

Sweden has a zero tolerance policy on drug consumption, yet we have the second highest rate of drug deaths in Europe. Portugal decriminalized all drugs a long time ago (big difference between decriminalization and legalization) and they have one of the lowest. It’s worked out great for them. So one way to really minimize gang activity and violence would be to legalize cannabis. This would create a safer society for everyone, especially low-income households in ghettos.

Also notice the interview with the locals, where that grenade casualty took place; They’re all immigrants. When PeterSweden ”reports” on Sweden he’s rarely honest enough to explain that immigrants are the most typical victims when it comes to these shootings and grenade attacks. Instead he tries to make it sound like middle-class Swedes are getting grenades chucked in their forehead while walking around downtown.

sweden lost 7

He has a tendency to try and make Sweden sound worse, or as bad, as America. Thus far there’s been 2 civilian deaths from grenades in 20 years. One 60-year old Chilean man and one 8-year old African boy. Meanwhile, the Boston Marathon bombings injured 264 people and killed 3. That’s just one attack in America.

I’m not downplaying the lives that were lost. Because even if it’s ”just” one or two individuals it is still a complete tragedy. Reading the article with the son of the 60-year old man is horrible.

He lives in Chile, and says: ”His partner told me he thought it was a toy, and that’s why he picked it up. Then it detonated. My father was a great man, with a good heart all through. He helped many people who were new in the country. People from Sweden have contacted me to let me know how much he helped them, and just how nice of a person he was. It’s so unfair that an innocent man is dead just because someone dropped a handgrenade there.”

His father was also planning on retiring soon, and residing in Thailand. He was also planning on visiting his family in his home country of Chile, which he hadn’t visited since 2001. But then the accident happened. That is just terrible.

Not to mention the son said: ”My father didn’t like walking around during evenings, because it was so unsafe there. Now I’ve been told there was a shooting the night before. That means there has to be people who know or have seen something about this grenade.”

But that’s not likely to happen. It’s been reported numerous times how unwilling locals are to testify when it comes to these types of crimes, because police just can’t offer them protection. They’re constantly forced to release gangmembers that they arrest due to ridiculous legislations and lenient prosecutors. Meaning if someone were to testify they would almost definitely get shot themselves.

Does Peter ever highlight the fact that it’s primarily immigrant lives that are being lost here? Does he ever highlight the fact that these are problems that can be resolved? No, instead he just does thumbnails saying: ”SWEDEN IS LOST!!!!” and runs away to Norway.

sweden lost

Thumbnail for his video “16 BOMBS in 1 month | SWEDEN”sweden lost 1sweden lost 2

The situation in Sweden is unacceptable. But something can be unacceptable without being a full-scale apocalypse. Sweden is not crumbling. It is “just” betraying the most vulnerable groups in society: Immigrants, women, the elderly, the mentally ill, and anyone else needing social security.

Anyway, some more info about the criminal world: If you buy automatic weapons you get grenades for free – like a bonus. For 1000 euro you can get 5 automatic weapons, ammo and 64 grenades. The reason why drug gangs use grenades is because it’s relatively cheap, access is good, and probably most importantly: it’s lead to few cases of prosecution.

According to Swedish law grenades aren’t considered weapons, but explosives, and the punishment for ” first degree violation of the law on explosives” is at least 1 year in prison and maximum 4 years. They are currently looking to sharpen these sentences. The government is also calling for a grenade amnesty, so criminals can turn in grenades without being prosecuted in order to get them off the streets.

As for Peter comparing Sweden’s grenade issue to Mexico, that part of SverigeRadio’s article was a mistake and has since been removed. But I see Breitbart didn’t bother updating their article, which is a shame.

Hypocrisy with freedom of speech

In Sweden, police don’t have time to investigate rapes due to gang-related murders and lack of resources. Yet PeterSweden wastes their time on reporting a ridiculous cartoon.

sweden lost 4

And this is the same guy constantly whining about how oppressive and communist Sweden is, for not allowing offensive jokes about muslims – among other things.


sweden lost 5.png

This is the picture she was prosecuted for:


Am I okay with that? No, fuck no. I believe in freedom of expression for real. Nobody should be prosecuted over a joke or racist comments. Threats, yes. Targeted large-scale harassment, yes. Shitty opinions and ugly wording? No. Hell no. That’s not worthy of a democracy.

Am I an innocent person?

No, I’m an asshole. And I decided to troll the shit out of Peter, at which point he took the bait and made himself look like a fool. Now the dumbass is ranting and raving about how that satirical comedy picture is some kind of disguised rape threat. As if anyone would seriously believe that I’d wanna take a ferry to Norway just to visit his dry asshole. Give me a break. That picture isn’t a threat to Peters safety. It’s a threat to his ego.

Even if something hurts a lot of people’s feelings, it should be allowed. That’s how we guarantee diversity of opinion, for better or worse. And especially if you’re a public figure, you should have thicker skin than that. Imagine if PewDiePie would write a tweet anytime someone writes him a threat, or something nasty? It would be ridiculous.


Look at that picture. Does that look nice to you? Does it look empathic? Does it look anything other than dehumanizing? No, hardly. But it’s still good satire, and it should not be criminal.

PeterSweden only believes in freedom of speech as long as it means making fun of muslims. When his side does it, it’s humor. When others do it, it’s a criminal offence.

He’s not good with numbers

For example, his ”1 in 8 women will be raped” is as bad as the feminist lies about campus rape.

This is how he did the math: Over the course of 85 years, 614’000 women will be raped. Therefore 1 in 8 women will be raped in their lifetime.

First of all, that’s not true. But even if it were true it’s not 1 in 8. That’s 1 in 8 over the span of 85 years. It’s not 1 in 8 during one year, or even 10 years.

Second of all, here’s the problem with his math: If you read the central beaurau of crime statistics, they say that 42% of the people exposed to sex offences were exposed between two and nine times. 12% were exposed ten times or more. Meaning a large part of offenses is happening to the same individuals, which brings the overall number down.

sweden lost 6.pngIt also gets tricky when you completely ignore demographics, like Peter does, because the risk varies greatly with age groups, ethnicity and location. Women in big cities are twice as likely to be victimized as women in small towns, and second generation immigrant women are more likely to be victimized than Swedish women. Therefore you can’t speak generally on all women. A large part of rape victims are immigrant women.

This article also explains why statistics aren’t that simple. Halmstad municipality usually have between 30 and 40 rape reports per year. But in 2016 they suddenly had 194. Why? Because a girl reported someone close to her for abuse during a period of several years, which went into the police register as 164 reports of rape. One victim, one perpetrator, and yet 164 cases in the statistics.

Considering how overrepresented non-european immigrants are when it comes to rape, it’s pretty obvious that immigration from non-european countries increases rapes. I’ve talked about this before. But that’s doesn’t eliminate all the other factors to consider here.

And that’s something I often see from Peters corner of the internet; just blatant ignoring the larger picture. In his response video he talks about how Sweden doubled it’s explosion attacks in 2017, racking up 200 attacks. What he fails to emphasize is that fireworks count as explosives as well, and grenade attacks in 2017 were 21.

Of course any amount of explosions is terrible. But he really doesn’t put much effort into nuancing and informing. Rather he seems to wanna confuse 200 explosions with 21 grenade attacks, then draw the conclusion that my entire country is doomed.

Hypocrisy with source criticism

Let’s look at some of the outlets that PeterSweden uses as sources.

SverigesRadio/SVT is Sweden’s public service media, with an obvious left-wing/green party bias. They’ve been caught lying about immigration numerous times, often shamelessly.

For example, they claimed that “never before have so many highly educated people fled to Sweden”, making the migrant wave look like a competence rain. In actuality, the migrants we’ve taken in the past year are notoriously poorly educated. SVT were torn apart by an economist on this.

Expressen is a liberal site and the second biggest paper in Sweden. They’ve co-operated with ANTIFA in the past to doxx nationalist politicians for racist comments posted anonymously online. They also did the same with completely ordinary citizens, who happen to be professors or entrepreneurs.

Aftonbladet is a socialist-feminist paper and the biggest one in Sweden. They did the same with numerous people, except they didn’t reveal anyones name. During the #MeToo campaign it was also revealed there’s a huge rape culture in their office, making them enormous hypocrites as well.

I could give you a shitload of examples of skeezy reporting, but put simply: Swedish mainstream media is pretty corrupt, have been caught with fake news numerous times, and without a doubt are responsible for making Sweden a worse place.

They were too afraid to report honestly on the issues with mass immigration until the migrant crisis, when things became so bad they were forced to report more honestly just to remain relevant. Alternative media has gotten more popular with the years, while mainstream media has lost both trust and revenue from the people. It’s not a surprise why they decided to become more honest in their reporting.

We’ve definitely had problems with the MSM covering things up because they don’t want to benefit the nationalist party, The Sweden Democrats, and they don’t want people to magically turn racist. A tactic that’s backfired, to say the least. In 2015 one of them even admitted to creating the echo chamber within the media, saying she was trying to do well but was misguided.

However: This does NOT mean that everything they report is fake. They do a lot of good, honest reporting as well, because not all journalists are dishonest scumbags. There’s many who are self-critical and don’t want to pander to political correctness. It’s a mixture, resulting in both brilliantly honest pieces being made, as well as the most dishonest disgusting fake news you’d imagine.

As a result, we can never rely on somebody’s reputation. Even good people can do bad things, and bad people can do good things. It’s important to always take it case-by-case, and look at the source itself. Not the outlet delivering the source. Whether it’s about mainstream media or alternative media.

And this is where Peters hypocrisy comes in. In my roast of him, he kept complaining about me using HopeNotHate as a source, when I was talking about how he lies about being more connected to Sweden than he is. He was born in Norway and has spent most of his life outside of Sweden, yet he tries to act otherwise. Because his image is his credibility to Americans abroad, a Swedish guy talking about Sweden.


His reasoning is that they aren’t trustworthy since they’re connected to the far-left. Well, HopeNotHate is not the source. Their sources is official government documents and Peters own tweets, which have since mysteriously disappeared. If he’s so bad at source critique that he doesn’t even understand how sources work, he really shouldn’t be calling himself a journalist.

HopeNotHate is not the source. They simply delivered the sources. I encourage you to read their article, the sources are hyperlinked in the text. Just click the coloured words.

Second of all, if you’re gonna argue that they are illigitimate as a source because of various connections to the far-left, then I can might as well argue that Peters “sources” about handgrenades and immigration issues are illigitimate. Because he also uses media connected to the far-left, namely the Swedish media.

This is simple logic that escapes him whenever someone calls him out, because it’s convenient that way.

Last, but certainly not least.

As I mentioned in the beginning of this article, honest news about Sweden are hard to find in English. That’s why PeterSweden is so popular. Ultimately you could say that he is the Frankenstein creation of the mainstream media themselves, because if they had just valued truth over political correctness we wouldn’t be where we are.

That’s something more journalists should think about. Telling the truth might be uncomfortable, but if you don’t do it anyway you might end up someplace even more uncomfortable in the long run.

And I know you can’t judge someone because of their fanbase. I’ve certainly noticed a lot of dumb people in my own. But it really does strike me like Peter’s fanbase are mainly right-wing christian Americans with strong tendencies towards not practicing what they preach.

And therefore I’ve created yet another comedy roast. Check it out if you’re in the mood for a giggle or two.

Thank you for reading.

Migration activist about her refugee child: “Boy or man? Lover or son?”

Swedish migration activist talks about her refugee child. She is conflicted. Boy, or man? Lover, or son?

Here’s a direct translation of what Lina tells the newspaper: “I can’t answer whether I love him or not, because I don’t know. It’s a position of dependence. But we’ve gotten to know each other and we have a tight relationship. We’ve quarreled, cried and discussed. Sometimes I don’t know what we’re doing. Is it my son, my best friend or an adult male?”

“Sometimes Omid asks me why I don’t see a man, but as it is right now I can’t meet a man. I’m afraid to have a relationship. What if we start something and then something else happens and we have a falling out. That uncertainty? Love is terrible and I can NEVER take risks. Maybe if I would meet someone who’s an activist within our refugee network, but that’s not likely. I’m an ordinary girl and I do normal things. It’s just that I’ve chosen to hide someone.”

“He tells me he’s never going to leave me. That he isn’t like a Swedish child. Well, then he is a child. He tells me he’s always going to be there for me because I’m going to need him. That he’s never going to forget. I won’t ever forget either.”



This reminds me of that other “activist” who described sleeping in the same bed as the refugee she took in. And when she contacted her friend because she felt guilty about it, the friend replied: “It’s okay. We all do it. The most important thing you can do right now is to give him intimacy and make him feel secure.”

The story of the tye-dye-witches and “refugee children” is the biggest political fraud in modern Swedish history.

Adult migrants pretend to be children, and are imported to satisfy middle-aged women. It’s costing the taxpayers so much that public institutions like hospitals and the police force can’t function properly. And yet NOT A SINGLE JOURNALIST in Sweden has covered this story.

The closest we get to a report on this is that video I did a while back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sass4jgyEUY

It’s nothing short of a scandal. How can the journalist elite of Sweden leave the reality-reporting over to an dude on YouTube?

And then they wonder why people don’t trust the media.

Terrorism forces us to reconsider gun laws

What many people might not know about Sweden is that the “gun control” debate is non-existent. It’s not even a political issue, it’s not debated, it isn’t adressed. In Sweden it’s just a given that people shouldn’t be allowed to use guns. It’s not even legal to carry pepper spray, no less a knife.

But consider this: The Islamic State has now encouraged its followers to attack people in their homes. To just choose a random apartment or suburbia house, go in there, and kill people.

“What if they choose my home?” <- That’s a thought nobody wants to have, but are forced to consider now, even if the chances are low.

ISIS latest statement also encouraged jihadists to attack markets, roads and general masses. That’s what we saw in England recently where 3 islamists first attacked people with a car, then jumped out and started stabbing random people in the streets.

Interpol has said that legalizing guns could prevent terrorism. Secretary general Ronald Noble referred to a massacre in Nairobi, where al-Shabab attacked a mall and killed 67 people, injuring 175. This attack lasted for hours. He ponders: Would it be possible for terrorists to spend several hours shooting people in a state like Texas?

Those who are pro gun-control need to ask themselves: Where would you rather be when a terror attack happens? In a location where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry guns? Or a location where they aren’t?

Politicians tell us not to be afraid. That “love will conquer”. I get the feeling that terrorism won’t be taken seriously until it starts happening in the politicians own white neighborhoods. Politicians don’t live in the same society we do. They live in nice apartheid-societies they’ve setup for themselves, where they never have to experience the consequences of their own decisions.

Bad people already have guns. Shouldn’t the good ones be allowed to have them too? It’s obvious the government isn’t gonna protect you at this point, so shouldn’t we at least be able to protect ourselves?

In Sweden it’s impossible for an average joe to buy a pistol that you can keep at home for self-defense. But if you wanna buy a gun illegally you can go to a ghetto and have it done in 5 hours.

Look at the Paris attacks in 2015. In the Bataclan 89 people died and more than 300 were injured, but over 1000 visitors were present in the location. Two police were nearby and before the special-operations team arrived they ran into the building and shot one of the terrorists.

Afterwards this action has been attributed with saving hundreds of peoples lives. The leader of the special-operations team, Christophe Molmy, said that the two cops made it possible to stop the killings.

But how ridiculous isn’t that? If one of the consert visitors would’ve been armed they could’ve done exactly what the cops did, and this long before the cops arrived. In other words, they could’ve saved even more peoples lives.

Should we, as citizens, just sit around and hope that a cop happens to be nearby when an attack is made on our lives? Unarmed citizens are just sitting ducks.



5 Swedish cops fail to arrest 1 refugee

The clip above went viral on Facebook in Sweden, 2 million views in 24 hours.

A lot of people are baffled at how cowardly the police are. Well, let me explain something about Sweden and put this into context.

In 2015 two security guards apprehended two young immigrants whose age is uncertain. The mainstream-media insisted that the kids were 9 and 11 years old, whereas other people claim they were 13 and 16.

This became a national news scandal.

These kid were wanted by the police since they had escaped from a halfway-house, so the guards were given direct orders to keep them put until the police arrived. When the boys realized this one of them started kicking and punching all he could, he also bit one of the guards so hard in his arm he started to bleed, the scar is visible to this day. The guard also got headbutted, and the boy spit so much around him that the other guard was forced to change clothes.

None of this was made clear in the mainstream-media. They immediately jumped at this with the angle that the two guards were sadistic creeps who derived pleasure from unnecessary violence. The media also made it appear as if the kids head was thrown into the ground, but it wasn’t.

To this very day, it’s easy to find numerous articles about how these boys are innocent victims, and the guards vicious predators. But it’s not very easy to find an article following up what happened, and nuancing with the guards perspective.

Here is one. It explains that the police investigation was dropped, and it was concluded that the guards behaved correctly in an extremely tough situation.

We also learn that the reason they took a time-out from work isn’t because of the ongoing investigation, as it was reported. It was due to safety reasons, and the two men feeling extremely shitty.

They recieved lots of threats. Their own children were gonna “get their heads smashed in too, with steel pipes”, and people would come to the central to ask their employers who “those two child abusers are”. Security guards all over the nation suddenly caught a bad rep because of the media.

Did any mainstream-media outlet in Sweden cover this?

Did anyone take responsibility for the fake news they created?

The media acted as a court and sentenced these men before it even got to trial. And they do this all the time. So just think about that when you see Swedish cops behaving like they do.

If there’s anything keeping the police force down in this country, it’s a burgoise journalist-elite who’ve never faced a tough situation in their entire life. Together with a political establishment always driving the hypothesis that the perpetrator is the victim.


The Truth About YouTubes Demise

This video perfectly summarizes everything that’s going wrong with YouTube lately, and where the site is headed in the future.

  • It’s not about left VS right.

All kinds of political channels are being censored through “restricted mode” and having their content demonetized, as well as channels that only deal with entertainment. While both left-wing and right-wing media corporations are excempt from this.

Why is Fox News, a really right-wing corporation, allowed on the trending page whereas my videos are censored from the trending page?

It’s because corporations don’t want to compete with independent news channels like Paul Joseph Watson, Sargon of Akkad, and yours truly.

  • YouTube wants to replace television.

This is their long-term goal, and big corporations can help with this since they have a big budget. Some of them apparently pay to show up on the trending-page, which I don’t think is an unfeasable theory. Otherwise, why would certain unpopular content be prioritized over popular content?

The “trending” page is supposed to go after what videos are hot alone. It doesn’t. I made a video that got more popular than Fox News video in a shorter period of time. Their video ended up on trending, mine didn’t.

This might surprise a lot of people but YouTube isn’t making any profit. After paying various expenses the site barely breaks even. So they’re being forced into the position where they’ll have to stifle creativity to keep advertisers from disappearing. Big brands are protesting as we speak.

This is not about political correctness VS free speech. It’s about corporations VS individuals. Corporations don’t want their ads to be connected with “hate speech”, and in this era of moral outrage that label will apply to just about anyone who is merely a dissident.

Someone needs to invent an alternative that can compete with YouTube, and they need to do it as soon as possible. This alternative needs to be centered around the libertarian idea of free speech. Minds.com is a good idea but they need to work on their video layout and try to introduce ads to their system.

In the future it is doubtful that a channel such as mine will even be allowed on YouTube. Because it certainly wouldn’t be allowed on television.

Sweden’s Government Isn’t Entirely Honest


The Government of Sweden released an article in English attempting to repair the image of Sweden abroad. Let’s go through some of their statements and take a look at how they might be problematic. My sources are hyperlinked so just click the coloured words to reach them.

Claim: “Sweden had its first islamic terrorist attack not so long ago”

The Governments Facts: The only known attempt at such an attack was in 2010. No one was harmed but the attacker.

That is true. However I would like to point out that Sweden has exported more jihadists than all of America. In 2015 it was estimated 250 people had joined ISIS from America. For Sweden it was around 300.

Do keep in mind that one single ISIS-fighter can cause a lot of damage. One person alone can achieve up to 200 kills, especially if they carry out a suicide bombing, and a lot of ISIS-fighters aren’t killed in action. They get educated in the art of killing, handling explosives, generally imbued with hate towards democracy and the West, and then they bring these skills and attitudes back home to the West.

When they return, they aren’t necessarily punished by Sweden. It’s not illegal to be an ISIS member here. For a long time, if the National Security Police (SÄPO) suspected someone will be joining ISIS all they could legally do is give them a phone call and ask them for a meeting – that the person isn’t legally obliged to attend. Although in 2016 it became illegal to travel abroad with intent to commit terrorist acts, or to participate in terror-training.

And it’s shameful it had to take that long. Sweden has been aware of the jihadist problem for several years, they’ve known about people traveling abroad to rape children and kill infidels since 2014. They did nothing. Gothenburg is the city having the most issues with this, yet they didn’t assign a coordinator against violent extremism until 2015. That was the first time it happened in Sweden.

Granted, we did assign Mona Sahlin as a national coordinator against terrorism in the summer of 2014, but all she managed to accomplish in a year was a hotline for the jihadists relatives. This is lethal neglect by our authorities.

They claim it’s hard to prosecute someone for war crimes abroad. So instead of punishing returning ISIS-fighters, or stripping them of their citizenships, we’ve seen suggestions by our politicians to give them therapy, housing and internships. In October of 2016 it was revealed 140 Swedish citizens had returned after fighting for ISIS, and several municipalities are going to handle this by giving them tax-funded drivers licenses, and helping them out with jobs and housing.

So Sweden might not have had it’s own terrorist attack yet. But it certainly has exported terror to other countries. Also, it has been revealed that Swedish humanitarian aid once went to Al-Qaida allies in Syria.

Claim: “There has been a major increase in the number of rapes in Sweden.”

The Governments Facts: The number of reported rapes in Sweden has risen. But the definition of rape has broadened over time, which makes it difficult to compare the figures. It is also misleading to compare the figures with other countries, as many acts that are considered rape under Swedish law are not considered rape in many other countries.

Sex crimes have doubled since 2012 and the legal definition of rape isn’t relevant here, because the source of these figures is the Crime Councils “safety survey”. They are generally considered more reliable than reports to the police, and this also means that factors like the definition of rape widening and taking time to apply in court doesn’t matter. Asking citizens what they’ve experienced and looking at people who dared to report are different things.

And according to safety survey numbers, women’s comfortability with reporting sex crime has actually gone down. Not up. Now this is an important detail, since this is often used as the theory to explain why there’s been an increase. From 2005-2010 women DID feel more comfortable reporting, but since 2010 it’s been going down.


In order to understand the effect immigration has on crime and rape, we need data. Obtaining that data is easy in other countries, but not in Sweden. The latest official report was in 2005, for the years 1997-2001. It confirmed that immigrants were significantly overrepresented. 4 times more likely to be suspects in homicide cases and 5.5 times more likely to be suspects of rape.

Since then, Swedish politicians have made sure not to release any more statistics. The numbers are being collected by statistical agencies, but they’re not being published. Parliament even denied a motion to produce up-to-date crime statistics based on national origin.

If we look at neighbouring countries, we might find an explanation there. In 2009 Norwegian police reported that non-Western immigrants were responsible for all assault rapes in Oslo the past 3 years. We’re talking about 41 reports. In the third largest city of Stavanger 2012, 90% of rapes were by non-natives, that’s 20 convictions. Those might be small numbers but the official police report from 2011 confirms the trend.


Perpetrator representation according to age and ethnic background. The blue-ish colour represents “non-Norwegians”. As you can see below, 61,2% of rapists were Norwegians. 10,5% were from Africa, 9,2% were from the Middle East, 12,5% were Europeans, 4,6% Asians and 2,0% Americans. I’d like to point out that “Asian” doesn’t just mean Chinese and Japanese, it can refer to Pakistanis and Afhans as well. Considering that South-East Asians have the lowest registered crime it is likely not predominantly Japanese and Chinese people here.


Now, notice that “Norwegian citizen” includes people with immigrant backgrounds as well. It is not just ethnic Norwegians that are Norwegian citizens. If we break it up according to continental background then the numbers are as following.


34,9% of rapists were Norwegians. 19,7% were from Africa, 15,1% from the Middle East, 14,5% from Asia, 13,8% from Europe and 2,0% from America. Considering that immigrants make out a minority in Norway, these numbers are remarkable.

I managed to come across a police report from 2015 as well, showing that immigrants commit a disproportionate amount of rapes. 25% of reported rapes that year were by non-European immigrants. The largest immigrant population is Polish followed by Lithuanians and Swedes. That’s saying something. 82% of victims were born in Norway.

Ethnic Norwegians make up 83.7% of the population as of 2016. Looking at these stats, you can do some quick math and realize that roughly 5.37% of the population commited 25% of all reported rapes in 2015. Or if you will, Africans are 6.25 times more likely to commit rape.

This gives an indication to why the government isn’t interested in updating the report from 2005.

In Sweden, we simply do not know what percentage of sex crimes and murders last year were done by immigrants. Because the government doesn’t want us to know. And on their website they have the nerve to claim that: “We have nothing to gain from covering up statistics and facts.”

Except for your reputation and all your credability. Since you are the ones who’ve been vouching for uncontrolled mass immigration to Sweden the past decade. You’re the ones who haven’t made it mandatory to deport criminal immigrants, you think age testing is racist and you refused to do border ID-controls until 2016.

The Swedish Government says: “According to the most recent study, people from foreign backgrounds are 2.5 times more likely to be suspected of crimes than people born in Sweden to Swedish-born parents.”

Please note how they’re avoiding the numbers for murder and rape. Yeah, immigrants are 2.5 times more likely to be suspected in general terms. But if you look at specific crimes like rape and murder it’s several times higher than that.

The government insists on there not being a cover up, while at the same time refusing to update the numbers. Do you know the best way to tell that they’re dishonest?

If immigrants weren’t severly overrepresented, they’d love to release those numbers because it would put an end to all speculation. It would remove all the appeal of far-right populist parties and their rhetoric. Instead, you’re fueling far-right populism with your lack of transparency.

On the website they claim that:In a later study, researchers at Stockholm University showed that the main difference in terms of criminal activity between immigrants and others in the population was due to differences in the socioeconomic conditions in which they grew up in Sweden.”

Yet the official report from 2005 clearly says, on page 21, that the overrepresentation remains even after controlling for these factors. Claiming that poverty is the cause of rape is offensive to all women who’ve been raped by middle-class men.

The Swedish Government says: “The studies show that the majority of those suspected of crimes were born in Sweden to two Swedish-born parents. The studies also show that the vast majority of people from foreign backgrounds are not suspected of any crimes.”

Yeah, because that needs pointing out. It’s not like it’s obvious that the majority of immigrants are cool people. Still doesn’t change the fact that a minority of bad apples can cause a huge amount of damage.

Nobody is disputing the fact that Swedish people commit crimes, the issue here is how disproportionately overrepresented certain immigrant groups are. Individiuals from North Africa and the Middle East have the highest registered crime. Western Europeans, South-East Asians and Americans have the lowest registered crime.

The big question is: If we already have a rape problem with ethnic Swedes, why make it even worse through the import of more rape? The majority of immigrants don’t rape, so they wouldn’t suffer from in-depth research into this overrepresentation, and what could be done to improve screening of potential criminals.

When someone wants to talk overrepresentation, and your first instinct is to shout “swedish men rape too!”, that clearly shows you’re arguing from a sense of nervous pseudo-morality. Not a thirst for knowledge.

The Swedish Government says: “Sweden is an open society governed by a principle of public access to official documents.”

Oh, so that’s why a man was denied work at the Central Bureau of Statistics, because he once wrote debate articles about immigration, using numbers from the Central Bureau of Statistics?

Sweden is a peaceful version of North Korea. You won’t go to jail for speaking your mind here, but there are social consequences. Losing your job and friends are some of them. The award-winning journalist Tim Pool went to Sweden and noted how afraid Swedes were of the social reprecussions for speaking up about these issues. It was hard to find anyone who would appear on camera with their face and identity.

Claim: “In Sweden there are a number of ‘no-go zones’ where criminality and gangs have taken over and where the emergency services do not dare to go.”

The Governments Facts: No. In a report published in February 2016, the Swedish Police Authority identified 53 residential areas around the country that have become increasingly marred by crime, social unrest and insecurity. These places have been incorrectly labelled ‘no-go zones’. What is true, however, is that in several of these areas the police have experienced difficulties fulfilling their duties; but it is not the case that the police do not go to them or that Swedish law does not apply there.

As I explained in a previous post, the only reason they don’t call it “no go zones” is because the police will drive in anyway. And get showered with rocks and potentially riots.

With “no go zones” you’re not trying to say that some places are impossible to visit for everyone at all times. It’s enough that there’s neighborhoods under such high control by criminals that ambulances and firetrucks can’t enter without police escort. The ambulance union demanded riot gear to be able to do their job, for christ sake.

In Seved the post office refuses to hand out packages due to safety reasons. In Tensta they haven’t had a meter maid for 8 months, because they’re afraid to go there. The same thing with journalists visiting BĂ€ckby, Husby, Rinkeby, etc, they get attacked for holding up cameras.

The point isn’t that these neighborhoods are impossible to enter. The point is that non-locals percieved as “intruders” get attacked, and these areas are highly problematic to the point where you start wondering who’s in charge: the cops or the criminals?

Claim: “The high level of immigration means that the system in Sweden is on the verge of collapse.”

The Governments Facts: No. The Swedish economy is strong. Despite the high costs of immigration, Sweden recorded a public finance surplus in 2015, and the forecasts indicate that the surplus is set to grow until 2020.

If the Swedish economy is so strong, why is the government forced to raise taxes AND make huge loans in order to afford immigration? As well as cuts to welfare?

They decreased money for health insurance, which affected handicapped people. A blind 2-year old in a wheelchair who depends on medicine for survival and needs attendance 24/7 was denied assistance. How does this rhyme well with a strong economy?

The government made assisted living for senior citizens more expensive, and even though they promised to raise pensions the poorest of the elderly got even less. In SollefteÄ women are being forced to give birth in their cars, since the local maternity ward was shut down due to savings. How does this rhyme with a strong economy?

Every fourth death in Lex Maria reports was due to lack of room and high workload. A patient died because they had to wait at the emergency for two days. An infant died because she was sent home too early. How are you gonna tell me that this isn’t a collapse? It might not be a total collapse where the hospital has been set on fire and burnt to the ground, but it’s certainly a collapse from an acceptable living standard.

The state health department came out and said that the large number of refugees are putting such a strain on the public welfare that hospitals, dental care and the psych ward can’t operate properly.

So the governments reply makes no sense. It’s misleading. It only looks at BNP, it doesn’t say anything about the access to housing, welfare and hospital care. Waiting times in Swedish hospitals are amongst the worst in Europe. We’re on the level of Serbia.

If Sweden’s economy is going so great, why aren’t they looking after their own citizens?

Claim: “Muslims will soon be in the majority in Sweden.”

The Governments Facts: No. It is estimated that there are a few hundred thousand people in Sweden whose roots are in predominantly Muslim countries. But this figure says nothing about how many are religious or not. The Muslim faith communities have approximately 140 000 members. This is about 1.5 per cent of Sweden’s population.

In 2010 there were 430’000 people in Sweden with a muslim background, 110’000 were members in an Islamic congregation. These numbers are from 2010. It is likely to assume they’ve gone up since then, since immigration from muslim countries has as well. I’m not making an indication that muslims will soon be a majority, I’m just stating the facts.

The Swedish Government: “Sweden needs immigration to compensate for the decline in numbers of babies being born here.”

What the? What did I just read?

Let me get this straight. Swedish people are declining in numbers, and therefore we need immigrants from muslim countries. But muslims aren’t gonna be the majority here in Sweden, because Swedish people are becoming fewer and fewer. And therefore we need more and more immigrants. But this doesn’t mean that they’re gonna be the majority eventually! Yeah, that TOTALLY adds up.

The government claims that they need immigration in order to keep the economy going, and at the same time they claim they have nothing to gain from covering up negative aspects of the migration policy. To me, this says it all.

It’s also worth mentioning that they’re blatantly wrong. Without immigration Sweden lies on a stable level of 2,01 in cohortfertility, or in layman terms: About 2 children per woman. The population isn’t increasing by much, but it’s also not decreasing. More people are born than there are dying. Also, an aging population might lead to more people having to support more people, but immigration also means that more people have to support more people, because even immigrants grow old eventually.

I do not believe that Sweden’s immigration policy is about being humanitarian. If it was, Sweden wouldn’t have decreased humanitarian aid to millions of people so they can import a couple thousand refugees into Sweden. Because that’s what happened.

In 2015, 8 billion SEK was taken out and spent on asylum immigration instead, the majority of those refugees being males. The red cross food package can last a family in a refugee camp for a whole month, and it costs 385 SEK. However, every new refugee in sweden costs 499 SEK per day. I think you can imagine the humanitarian disaster here. Yet, when interviewed by SVT, the humanitarian aid minister explains that she finds this “morally justifiable”.

In 2016 the government also cut down on humanitarian aid for various health organisations that combat aids, tuberculosis and malaria. These organisations were already promised 300 million, but when that money suddenly disappeared 159 organisations chose to protest. According to calculations by the Global fund, the result of this suspended funding is 20’000 more deaths and almost one million people becoming infected with HIV, tuberculosis and malaria. Once again, this was the decision of our feminist government.

The majority of refugees are left behind in the conflict area. Immigration per say really only helps about 1% of refugees, the remaining 99% need food, water and safety until the conflict resides. So that the government is working hard to prioritize the import of people into Sweden says they’re prioritizing citizen growth, not to help as many as possible.

Sweden’s immigration policy isn’t about humanitarianism. It’s about the economy.

Every country is it’s own corporation, where the citizens are employees, and every corporation seeks continual growth and eternally growing profit. Less employees, less money. Certain countries do have falling birthrates, so the world bank and the UN have suggested “replacement migration” as a solution. A decrease in population is a decrease in economic growth.

What this is, put simply, is that it’s much easier to replace the population than it is to replace the economic system. As usual, it’s all about the money. And that’s how we need to start viewing what’s happening in the world.

If you have read this far, I thank you for your patience.


Angry Foreigner